ATA says taxation issues pose hurdles for foreign airlines
AVIATION & AIRPORTS

ATA says taxation issues pose hurdles for foreign airlines

The president of IATA warned that airlines would leave the Indian market if tax-related issues were not resolved in India. Over the past few months, the India offices of numerous multinational aircraft companies have received tax evasion alerts from the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). Among other airlines, notice has been sent to British Airways, Lufthansa, and Emirates. Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, Emirates, Singapore Airlines, Thai Airways, and Airlines of Saudi Arabia.

Wille Walsh, the director general of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), responded to a query from ET, stating that, as a consequence, there might be a withdrawal of these airlines from the Indian market. He explained that this withdrawal typically occurs gradually, with airlines reducing the number of flights due to its impact on profitability, eventually leading to a complete withdrawal. He made these remarks while speaking on the sidelines of the Annual General Meeting of IATA in Dubai. According to Walsh, notices were issued for non-payment of tax on services such as maintenance, crew payments, and aircraft lease rentals, which are provided by the airlines to their Indian entity. IATA, in its communication with the Indian government, argued that these services' place was both the head office and branch office, suggesting that airlines should only be liable to pay taxes on services taxable in India, like payments for hotel accommodation used by Indian staff outside of India.

A senior airline official clarified that when a foreign airline obtains permission to operate in India, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) grants permission to the global headquarters, not the local unit. Therefore, holding the airline liable for services is a legal grey area. The official mentioned that they have requested that the government suspend this.

IATA further stated that airlines' branch offices in India do not engage in crucial operations such as contracting for aircraft leases, crew, pilots, fuel, and maintenance. All operations to and from India are decided, controlled, and operated by airlines' head offices. Thus, attributing strategic and operational risks and functions to the branch offices in India is legally inaccurate, according to IATA.

Walsh expressed optimism about opportunities in the Indian aviation sector but emphasised that the government needs to implement the right policies to unlock the country?s potential. He highlighted the example of the Chinese market, which constitutes 12% of global aviation, indicating the potential for growth in India, contingent upon the government's policy decisions.

The president of IATA warned that airlines would leave the Indian market if tax-related issues were not resolved in India. Over the past few months, the India offices of numerous multinational aircraft companies have received tax evasion alerts from the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). Among other airlines, notice has been sent to British Airways, Lufthansa, and Emirates. Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, Emirates, Singapore Airlines, Thai Airways, and Airlines of Saudi Arabia. Wille Walsh, the director general of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), responded to a query from ET, stating that, as a consequence, there might be a withdrawal of these airlines from the Indian market. He explained that this withdrawal typically occurs gradually, with airlines reducing the number of flights due to its impact on profitability, eventually leading to a complete withdrawal. He made these remarks while speaking on the sidelines of the Annual General Meeting of IATA in Dubai. According to Walsh, notices were issued for non-payment of tax on services such as maintenance, crew payments, and aircraft lease rentals, which are provided by the airlines to their Indian entity. IATA, in its communication with the Indian government, argued that these services' place was both the head office and branch office, suggesting that airlines should only be liable to pay taxes on services taxable in India, like payments for hotel accommodation used by Indian staff outside of India. A senior airline official clarified that when a foreign airline obtains permission to operate in India, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) grants permission to the global headquarters, not the local unit. Therefore, holding the airline liable for services is a legal grey area. The official mentioned that they have requested that the government suspend this. IATA further stated that airlines' branch offices in India do not engage in crucial operations such as contracting for aircraft leases, crew, pilots, fuel, and maintenance. All operations to and from India are decided, controlled, and operated by airlines' head offices. Thus, attributing strategic and operational risks and functions to the branch offices in India is legally inaccurate, according to IATA. Walsh expressed optimism about opportunities in the Indian aviation sector but emphasised that the government needs to implement the right policies to unlock the country?s potential. He highlighted the example of the Chinese market, which constitutes 12% of global aviation, indicating the potential for growth in India, contingent upon the government's policy decisions.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code