+
CAG Audit exposes discrepancies in BBP-1 implementation
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

CAG Audit exposes discrepancies in BBP-1 implementation

The audit report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) regarding the 'Implementation of Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana (BPP-1)' has brought to light significant revelations. The report highlights that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) Board sanctioned the Dwarka Expressway at a civil cost of Rs 72.87 billion, equating to Rs 2.50 billion per kilometre. This stands in stark contrast to the per kilometre civil cost of Rs 182 million that had been approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).

In addition, the report uncovers that the Delhi-Vadodara Expressway, with an estimated civil cost of approximately Rs 328.39 billion, was endorsed by the NHAI Board even though it had not been included in the list of BPP-I projects approved by the CCEA.

The report sheds light on the fact that NHAI was responsible for the development of 70,950 km out of the designated 76,999 km of national highways for BPP-I. The NHAI was granted the authority to determine the construction approach for its projects. However, the audit discerned that NHAI was making decisions about construction methods without proper documented justifications.

According to the CAG report, "The audit also noticed that the evaluation and approval framework initially proposed to the CCEA failed to establish clear definitions for the terms 'project' and 'package'. As a result, the determination of whether construction packages within a single project should be regarded as individual projects or combined as one comprehensive project lacked clarity."

The CAG report further expounds that the appraisal and endorsement framework stipulated by the CCEA for BPP-I was not being adhered to by the entities responsible for project execution.

"The analysis encompassed a sample of 50 NHAI projects, and among these, eight projects had not undergone appraisal by the Project Appraisal and Technical Scrutiny Committee. This omission occurred due to the projects either being evaluated under the previous NHDP program or classified as balance works or one-time improvement initiatives," the report elucidated.

The audit report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) regarding the 'Implementation of Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana (BPP-1)' has brought to light significant revelations. The report highlights that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) Board sanctioned the Dwarka Expressway at a civil cost of Rs 72.87 billion, equating to Rs 2.50 billion per kilometre. This stands in stark contrast to the per kilometre civil cost of Rs 182 million that had been approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).In addition, the report uncovers that the Delhi-Vadodara Expressway, with an estimated civil cost of approximately Rs 328.39 billion, was endorsed by the NHAI Board even though it had not been included in the list of BPP-I projects approved by the CCEA.The report sheds light on the fact that NHAI was responsible for the development of 70,950 km out of the designated 76,999 km of national highways for BPP-I. The NHAI was granted the authority to determine the construction approach for its projects. However, the audit discerned that NHAI was making decisions about construction methods without proper documented justifications.According to the CAG report, The audit also noticed that the evaluation and approval framework initially proposed to the CCEA failed to establish clear definitions for the terms 'project' and 'package'. As a result, the determination of whether construction packages within a single project should be regarded as individual projects or combined as one comprehensive project lacked clarity.The CAG report further expounds that the appraisal and endorsement framework stipulated by the CCEA for BPP-I was not being adhered to by the entities responsible for project execution.The analysis encompassed a sample of 50 NHAI projects, and among these, eight projects had not undergone appraisal by the Project Appraisal and Technical Scrutiny Committee. This omission occurred due to the projects either being evaluated under the previous NHDP program or classified as balance works or one-time improvement initiatives, the report elucidated.

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Kavach 4.0 Commissioned on Delhi–Mumbai and Delhi–Howrah

"Kavach version four has been commissioned on 1,452 route km, covering the high density Delhi–Mumbai and Delhi–Howrah corridors. The rollout included laying 8,570 km of optical fibre, installation of 1,100 telecom towers, deployment of trackside equipment over 6,776 RKm and establishment of 767 station data centres. Trackside implementation has been taken up on 24,427 RKm covering Golden Quadrilateral, Golden Diagonal and High Density Network sections. The programme aims to strengthen signalling and train protection on key routes.Kavach is an indigenously developed automatic train protecti..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Railways Advance Kalyan–Murbad Line And Mumbai Capacity Expansion

"Indian Railways is advancing multiple rail infrastructure projects in Maharashtra, including the sanctioned Kalyan–Murbad new line and sizable investments under the Mumbai Urban Transport Project and the Mumbai–Ahmedabad High Speed Rail project. The Kalyan–Murbad 28 km new line has been sanctioned at Rs 8.36 billion (bn) on a 50:50 cost-sharing basis with the Government of Maharashtra and has been declared a Special Railway Project for land acquisition; proposals covering 214 hectares are at various stages of acquisition. Budgetary outlay for projects falling fully or partly in Maharash..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Parliamentary Panel Flags Funding Gaps in Heavy Industries

"The Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Industry (Rajya Sabha) presented its 332nd report on the Demands for Grants 2026-27 of the Ministry of Heavy Industries (MHI). Figures converted from crore and lakh are expressed in million (mn). The Budget Estimates 2026-27 for the Ministry stand at Rs 79,399 mn against a projected requirement of Rs 94,843.2 mn, a shortfall of about 16 per cent, with revenue at Rs 79,370.8 mn and capital compressed to Rs 28.2 mn from Rs 5,020 mn.The committee flagged recurring BE-to-RE compression and declining revised estimate utilisation, and calle..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement