CAG Audit exposes discrepancies in BBP-1 implementation
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

CAG Audit exposes discrepancies in BBP-1 implementation

The audit report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) regarding the 'Implementation of Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana (BPP-1)' has brought to light significant revelations. The report highlights that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) Board sanctioned the Dwarka Expressway at a civil cost of Rs 72.87 billion, equating to Rs 2.50 billion per kilometre. This stands in stark contrast to the per kilometre civil cost of Rs 182 million that had been approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).

In addition, the report uncovers that the Delhi-Vadodara Expressway, with an estimated civil cost of approximately Rs 328.39 billion, was endorsed by the NHAI Board even though it had not been included in the list of BPP-I projects approved by the CCEA.

The report sheds light on the fact that NHAI was responsible for the development of 70,950 km out of the designated 76,999 km of national highways for BPP-I. The NHAI was granted the authority to determine the construction approach for its projects. However, the audit discerned that NHAI was making decisions about construction methods without proper documented justifications.

According to the CAG report, "The audit also noticed that the evaluation and approval framework initially proposed to the CCEA failed to establish clear definitions for the terms 'project' and 'package'. As a result, the determination of whether construction packages within a single project should be regarded as individual projects or combined as one comprehensive project lacked clarity."

The CAG report further expounds that the appraisal and endorsement framework stipulated by the CCEA for BPP-I was not being adhered to by the entities responsible for project execution.

"The analysis encompassed a sample of 50 NHAI projects, and among these, eight projects had not undergone appraisal by the Project Appraisal and Technical Scrutiny Committee. This omission occurred due to the projects either being evaluated under the previous NHDP program or classified as balance works or one-time improvement initiatives," the report elucidated.

The audit report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) regarding the 'Implementation of Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana (BPP-1)' has brought to light significant revelations. The report highlights that the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) Board sanctioned the Dwarka Expressway at a civil cost of Rs 72.87 billion, equating to Rs 2.50 billion per kilometre. This stands in stark contrast to the per kilometre civil cost of Rs 182 million that had been approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).In addition, the report uncovers that the Delhi-Vadodara Expressway, with an estimated civil cost of approximately Rs 328.39 billion, was endorsed by the NHAI Board even though it had not been included in the list of BPP-I projects approved by the CCEA.The report sheds light on the fact that NHAI was responsible for the development of 70,950 km out of the designated 76,999 km of national highways for BPP-I. The NHAI was granted the authority to determine the construction approach for its projects. However, the audit discerned that NHAI was making decisions about construction methods without proper documented justifications.According to the CAG report, The audit also noticed that the evaluation and approval framework initially proposed to the CCEA failed to establish clear definitions for the terms 'project' and 'package'. As a result, the determination of whether construction packages within a single project should be regarded as individual projects or combined as one comprehensive project lacked clarity.The CAG report further expounds that the appraisal and endorsement framework stipulated by the CCEA for BPP-I was not being adhered to by the entities responsible for project execution.The analysis encompassed a sample of 50 NHAI projects, and among these, eight projects had not undergone appraisal by the Project Appraisal and Technical Scrutiny Committee. This omission occurred due to the projects either being evaluated under the previous NHDP program or classified as balance works or one-time improvement initiatives, the report elucidated.

Next Story
Resources

ULCCS Showcases Cooperative Model at UN Symposium

Uralungal Labour Contract Co-operative Society (ULCCS) showcased its community-led development model at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, where it participated as a panellist at the International Symposium on Cooperative Financial Institutions held on 28–29 May 2026.Jointly organised by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), the International Cooperative Banking Association (ICBA), and the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA), the symposium was held under the theme ‘Fuelling Inclusive and Equitable Growth’ and brought together policymakers,..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Delhi Airport to Finalise 20-Year Master Plan

Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL) is finalising a 20-year master plan to guide long term infrastructure and operational development at Indira Gandhi International Airport, an official said. The operator expects the plan to reflect changes in the airline industry, shifts in the competitive landscape and evolving infrastructure requirements across terminals, airside and support services. The official said the document is likely to be ready in the next two to two-and-a-half months as the operator moves through planning stages. The plan will be prepared after consultations with airport users ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Aadhar Housing Finance Targets Rs 500 bn AUM By FY29

Aadhar Housing Finance has set a target to raise its asset under management to Rs 500 billion (bn) by the end of FY29, aiming to achieve this over the next three financial years through an 18-20 per cent loan growth trajectory. The firm focuses on the low-income segment with a ticket size of less than Rs 1.5 million (mn) and has relied on that segment to drive expansion. The company closed FY26 with an AUM of Rs 305.71 bn, reflecting the expansion in recent years, and it reported a net profit rise of 22 per cent to Rs 11.08 bn. Management indicated that gross non-performing assets stood at 1.0..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

-->