Gauhati HC seeks Centre & NHAI to clarify stance on NH 715 alignment
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

Gauhati HC seeks Centre & NHAI to clarify stance on NH 715 alignment

The Gauhati High Court instructed the central government and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to clarify their stance on the alignment of National Highway No. 715, which runs from Kaliabor Tiniali to Numaligarh. This section of NH 715 (formerly NH 37) is undergoing expansion into a four-lane highway. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Vijay Bishnoi and Justice Kaushik Goswami heard arguments in two Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitions (Nos. 38/2024 and 61/2024) filed by petitioners opposing the approval granted by the authorities for a new alignment of NH 715 during its expansion. The court noted that decisions regarding new highway construction and the widening of existing highways typically fall under the jurisdiction of NHAI experts, and courts usually avoid intervening in such matters while exercising their extraordinary writ jurisdiction. However, counsel for the petitioners argued that the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) had clearly defined the alignment of NH 715 in its official records. According to MoRTH, NH 715 begins at its junction with NH-15 near Tezpur, connecting Jakhalabandha, Bokakhat, and Jorhat, and terminates at NH-2 near Jhanji in Assam. The petitioners contended that the ongoing expansion deviates from this originally specified alignment. Senior counsel for PIL 38/2024 highlighted a meeting held on October 19, 2024, attended by Assam’s Minister of Transport & Fisheries, NHAI officials, and local representatives. In this meeting, NHAI clarified that the NH 715 expansion was a Brown Field project, involving the upgrading of the existing highway and two bypasses. The petitioners argued that, based on MoRTH’s guidelines, widening an existing highway qualifies as a Brown Field project, while construction along a new alignment is categorized as a Green Field project. They claimed there was no justification for deviating from the original alignment for NH 715's expansion. After reviewing these submissions, the court directed the Union of India and NHAI to respond to the issues raised. It instructed Deputy Solicitor General of India R.K.D. Choudhury and NHAI standing counsel C. Boruah to file their responses within two weeks.

The Gauhati High Court instructed the central government and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to clarify their stance on the alignment of National Highway No. 715, which runs from Kaliabor Tiniali to Numaligarh. This section of NH 715 (formerly NH 37) is undergoing expansion into a four-lane highway. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Vijay Bishnoi and Justice Kaushik Goswami heard arguments in two Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitions (Nos. 38/2024 and 61/2024) filed by petitioners opposing the approval granted by the authorities for a new alignment of NH 715 during its expansion. The court noted that decisions regarding new highway construction and the widening of existing highways typically fall under the jurisdiction of NHAI experts, and courts usually avoid intervening in such matters while exercising their extraordinary writ jurisdiction. However, counsel for the petitioners argued that the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) had clearly defined the alignment of NH 715 in its official records. According to MoRTH, NH 715 begins at its junction with NH-15 near Tezpur, connecting Jakhalabandha, Bokakhat, and Jorhat, and terminates at NH-2 near Jhanji in Assam. The petitioners contended that the ongoing expansion deviates from this originally specified alignment. Senior counsel for PIL 38/2024 highlighted a meeting held on October 19, 2024, attended by Assam’s Minister of Transport & Fisheries, NHAI officials, and local representatives. In this meeting, NHAI clarified that the NH 715 expansion was a Brown Field project, involving the upgrading of the existing highway and two bypasses. The petitioners argued that, based on MoRTH’s guidelines, widening an existing highway qualifies as a Brown Field project, while construction along a new alignment is categorized as a Green Field project. They claimed there was no justification for deviating from the original alignment for NH 715's expansion. After reviewing these submissions, the court directed the Union of India and NHAI to respond to the issues raised. It instructed Deputy Solicitor General of India R.K.D. Choudhury and NHAI standing counsel C. Boruah to file their responses within two weeks.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Reliance, Diehl Advance Pact for Precision-Guided Munitions

Diehl Defence CEO Helmut Rauch and Reliance Group’s Founder Chairman Anil D. Ambani have held discussions to advance their ongoing strategic partnership focused on Guided and Terminally Guided Munitions (TGM), under a cooperation agreement originally signed in 2019.This collaboration underscores Diehl Defence’s long-term commitment to the Indian market and its support for the Indian Government’s Make in India initiative. The partnership’s current emphasis is on the urgent supply of the Vulcano 155mm Precision Guided Munition system to the Indian Armed Forces.Simultaneously, the “Vulc..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Modis Navnirman to Migrate to Main Board, Merge Subsidiary

Modis Navnirman Limited has announced that its Board of Directors has approved a key strategic initiative involving migration from the BSE SME platform to the Main Board of both BSE and NSE, alongside a merger with its wholly owned subsidiary, Shree Modis Navnirman Private Limited.The move to the main boards marks a major milestone in the company’s growth trajectory, reflecting its consistent financial performance, robust corporate governance, and long-term commitment to value creation. This transition will grant the company access to a broader investor base, improve market participation, en..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Global Capital Flows Remain Subdued, EMEA Leads in Q1 2025

The Bharat InvITs Association’s industry update for Q1 2025 shows subdued global capital flows, with investment volumes remaining at the lower end of the five-year range despite a late 2024 recovery. According to data from Colliers and MSCI Real Capital Analytics, activity in North America declined slightly, while EMEA maintained steady levels and emerged as the top region for investment in standing assets.The EMEA region now hosts seven of the top ten cross-border capital destinations for standing assets, pushing the United States’ share of global activity below 15 per cent. Meanwhile, in..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?