Indian vs. overseas brands

01 Mar 2019 CW Staff

Indian brands of earthmoving equipment are making inroads in the market but still don’t measure up to machines from global brands like CAT, Wirtgen and Vogele, says Pramod Joshi, DGM, P&M Operation, JMC Projects India. “Machines from overseas brands are more expensive to buy but make up in higher productivity and lower maintenance cost, besides performing more accurately.”

“We are engaged in reputed four to eight lane expressway projects that need heavy and quality machines,” says Ashim Paul, Plant & Machinery Head, Adani Transport. “We usually prefer compactors, pavers, graders and excavators from global brands as they are more accurate, productive and meet the NHAI codes specified for equipment.”

“The lack of quality of products made in India relevant for the requirement has led to demand for foreign alternatives, Chinese or Italian machines that can fit contractors’ ROI target,” agrees Manish Arora, Business Head, Mahindra Construction Equipment.

With many global brands now manufacturing in India, it isn’t as if using a global brand implies using an imported machine. Nischal Mehrotra, Director, Sales & Marketing, LiuGong India tells us that imported construction machines form a minuscule amount of all machines in use: “Primarily, motor graders and higher tonnage excavators are being imported.”

So, what needs to be done to build world-class Indian construction equipment brands?

Joshi believes Indian companies need to be driven by quality over quantity and focus on R&D to compete with global manufacturers. He cites the example of asphalt pavers—“India is still nowhere in that segment; we need to develop a world-class machine.”

“Government incentives to the sector may help improve the quality of machines,” believes Joshi.

Additionally, he also sees scope for the Government to support Indian brands. “To some extent, the Government is furthering the use of equipment from global brands by specifying (in tenders) the use of machines with built-in sensors; and rightly so because they perform better,” he says. “To incentivise domestic companies, the Government must insist on the use of Indian equipment for all projects.”

- CHARU BAHRI

"Join industry leaders at RAHSTA Expo, India's premier platform for roads, highways and traffic infrastructure. Register now to explore innovations, network with experts and shape the future of mobility."

Indian brands of earthmoving equipment are making inroads in the market but still don’t measure up to machines from global brands like CAT, Wirtgen and Vogele, says Pramod Joshi, DGM, P&M Operation, JMC Projects India. “Machines from overseas brands are more expensive to buy but make up in higher productivity and lower maintenance cost, besides performing more accurately.”“We are engaged in reputed four to eight lane expressway projects that need heavy and quality machines,” says Ashim Paul, Plant & Machinery Head, Adani Transport. “We usually prefer compactors, pavers, graders and excavators from global brands as they are more accurate, productive and meet the NHAI codes specified for equipment.”“The lack of quality of products made in India relevant for the requirement has led to demand for foreign alternatives, Chinese or Italian machines that can fit contractors’ ROI target,” agrees Manish Arora, Business Head, Mahindra Construction Equipment.With many global brands now manufacturing in India, it isn’t as if using a global brand implies using an imported machine. Nischal Mehrotra, Director, Sales & Marketing, LiuGong India tells us that imported construction machines form a minuscule amount of all machines in use: “Primarily, motor graders and higher tonnage excavators are being imported.”So, what needs to be done to build world-class Indian construction equipment brands?Joshi believes Indian companies need to be driven by quality over quantity and focus on R&D to compete with global manufacturers. He cites the example of asphalt pavers—“India is still nowhere in that segment; we need to develop a world-class machine.” “Government incentives to the sector may help improve the quality of machines,” believes Joshi.Additionally, he also sees scope for the Government to support Indian brands. “To some extent, the Government is furthering the use of equipment from global brands by specifying (in tenders) the use of machines with built-in sensors; and rightly so because they perform better,” he says. “To incentivise domestic companies, the Government must insist on the use of Indian equipment for all projects.”- CHARU BAHRI

Infrastructure Urban

26 Jun 2026

PRS International marks 18 years of global advisory work

PRS International Group of Companies recently said it has strengthened its position as a sovereign-grade multinational advisory organisation, marking nearly 18 years of operations across strategic communications, institutional advisory and international cooperation. The Group, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. and New Delhi, said its work spans more than 190 countries and supports governments, multilateral institutions, investors, corporations and private clients. The organisation said its services cover government advisory, crisis management, trade and investment facilitation, nation bra..

Infrastructure Energy

26 Jun 2026

Tata Power Secures Karnataka Transmission Project

Tata Power has won a power transmission project in Karnataka after emerging as the successful bidder in a tariff-based competitive bidding process run by PFC Consulting, a wholly owned subsidiary of Power Finance Corporation. The company received a Letter of Intent from PFC Consulting for a renewable energy evacuation scheme to be delivered under a Build, Own, Operate and Transfer model. The award follows a competitive selection and positions the firm to expand its transmission activities in the state. As part of the contract, Tata Power will acquire the special purpose vehicle (SPV) created f..

Infrastructure Energy

26 Jun 2026

S&P Global Says Tariff And Investment Rules Needed In Power Market

Researchers at S&P Global Energy, the research arm of S&P Global, said that government regulation on tariff and investment should complement competition in power markets, since transmission and distribution remain natural monopolies requiring large capital investments. The firm argued that enabling competition among existing companies is more important than bringing in more entrants. It noted that the power sector is a heavy industry where scale delivers value, particularly in transmission and distribution. The researchers emphasised that regulation must address tariff setting and investment p..