Road Builders Face Order Challenges Amid Shift to BOT and HAM Models
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

Road Builders Face Order Challenges Amid Shift to BOT and HAM Models

India Ratings and Research reported that small and mid-sized road construction firms may struggle to secure new orders in the medium term due to a decline in government-issued engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contracts. The agency attributed this trend to the government's increased preference for build-operate-transfer (BOT) and hybrid annuity model (HAM) projects over traditional EPC contracts. The shift is expected to intensify competition in the EPC segment, favoring large players with strong financials. Smaller firms, often lacking the significant upfront capital required for BOT and HAM projects, may face barriers to participation, coupled with heightened execution and funding risks. BOT projects, in particular, pose additional challenges such as toll risks and slow financial closures. Although 80% of the required right of way is typically available in advance, delays in clearing remaining sites have caused discomfort among lenders. However, the BOT and HAM models also demand a long-term commitment from developers, often spanning 15 years, which fosters more stable business profiles compared to the EPC model. Some mid-sized EPC developers are gradually transitioning to HAM projects and have begun securing orders under this framework. "The government's pivot to BOT and HAM models will transform the sector's dynamics," noted Abhash Sharma, Senior Director and Group Head Ratings Mid Corporates at Ind-Ra. He emphasised that companies with strong credit profiles and long-term strategies are better positioned to endure, while others may need to act as EPC contractors for larger developers, facing increased competition and margin pressures. For mid-sized EPC firms, geographic and client concentration remains a key concern, with 40–60% or more of their revenue often tied to a few top clients, heightening customer-related risks. Additionally, these firms frequently grapple with stretched working capital cycles and heavy reliance on creditor-backed letters of comfort, particularly among lower-rated entities. As the government reverts to a refined BOT/HAM project model, India Ratings foresees a challenging future for small and mid-sized EPC players, as the focus shifts to construction quality and achieving financial closure before project initiation. (ET)

India Ratings and Research reported that small and mid-sized road construction firms may struggle to secure new orders in the medium term due to a decline in government-issued engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contracts. The agency attributed this trend to the government's increased preference for build-operate-transfer (BOT) and hybrid annuity model (HAM) projects over traditional EPC contracts. The shift is expected to intensify competition in the EPC segment, favoring large players with strong financials. Smaller firms, often lacking the significant upfront capital required for BOT and HAM projects, may face barriers to participation, coupled with heightened execution and funding risks. BOT projects, in particular, pose additional challenges such as toll risks and slow financial closures. Although 80% of the required right of way is typically available in advance, delays in clearing remaining sites have caused discomfort among lenders. However, the BOT and HAM models also demand a long-term commitment from developers, often spanning 15 years, which fosters more stable business profiles compared to the EPC model. Some mid-sized EPC developers are gradually transitioning to HAM projects and have begun securing orders under this framework. The government's pivot to BOT and HAM models will transform the sector's dynamics, noted Abhash Sharma, Senior Director and Group Head Ratings Mid Corporates at Ind-Ra. He emphasised that companies with strong credit profiles and long-term strategies are better positioned to endure, while others may need to act as EPC contractors for larger developers, facing increased competition and margin pressures. For mid-sized EPC firms, geographic and client concentration remains a key concern, with 40–60% or more of their revenue often tied to a few top clients, heightening customer-related risks. Additionally, these firms frequently grapple with stretched working capital cycles and heavy reliance on creditor-backed letters of comfort, particularly among lower-rated entities. As the government reverts to a refined BOT/HAM project model, India Ratings foresees a challenging future for small and mid-sized EPC players, as the focus shifts to construction quality and achieving financial closure before project initiation. (ET)

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?