SC Upholds Yamuna Expressway Land Acquisition
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

SC Upholds Yamuna Expressway Land Acquisition

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition for the Yamuna Expressway and its adjoining areas in Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. The judgement resolves a long-standing conflict over the application of urgency provisions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The bench, comprising Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, dismissed landowners' appeals while allowing the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority's (YEIDA) cross-appeals. Justice Mehta, authoring the 49-page verdict, emphasized that the acquisition was integral to the expressway's development and adjoining areas, serving unified public-interest objectives.

Key Observations: Integrated Development: The court ruled that the land acquisition was part of an integrated development plan for the Yamuna Expressway, ensuring overall regional growth. Urgency Clause Justified: The application of urgency provisions under sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act was deemed legal, citing rapid development needs and prevention of unauthorized encroachments. Uniform Compensation: The bench upheld the Allahabad High Court’s 64.7% enhanced compensation as a "No Litigation Bonus," ruling out further enhancements to ensure equity among affected landowners. The Supreme Court also addressed conflicting Allahabad High Court rulings:

It affirmed the Kamal Sharma case, which upheld the acquisition and granted enhanced compensation. It invalidated the Shyoraj Singh case as "per-incuriam," which had quashed the acquisition citing arbitrary urgency clause application. This verdict concludes disputes stemming from 2009 land acquisitions, paving the way for continued development of the Yamuna Expressway, a critical infrastructure project connecting the region's economic hubs.

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition for the Yamuna Expressway and its adjoining areas in Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. The judgement resolves a long-standing conflict over the application of urgency provisions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The bench, comprising Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, dismissed landowners' appeals while allowing the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority's (YEIDA) cross-appeals. Justice Mehta, authoring the 49-page verdict, emphasized that the acquisition was integral to the expressway's development and adjoining areas, serving unified public-interest objectives. Key Observations: Integrated Development: The court ruled that the land acquisition was part of an integrated development plan for the Yamuna Expressway, ensuring overall regional growth. Urgency Clause Justified: The application of urgency provisions under sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act was deemed legal, citing rapid development needs and prevention of unauthorized encroachments. Uniform Compensation: The bench upheld the Allahabad High Court’s 64.7% enhanced compensation as a No Litigation Bonus, ruling out further enhancements to ensure equity among affected landowners. The Supreme Court also addressed conflicting Allahabad High Court rulings: It affirmed the Kamal Sharma case, which upheld the acquisition and granted enhanced compensation. It invalidated the Shyoraj Singh case as per-incuriam, which had quashed the acquisition citing arbitrary urgency clause application. This verdict concludes disputes stemming from 2009 land acquisitions, paving the way for continued development of the Yamuna Expressway, a critical infrastructure project connecting the region's economic hubs.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Concord Control Systems Limited Reports ~85% YoY Growth in H1 FY26

Concord Control Systems Limited (BSE: CNCRD | 543619), India’s leading manufacturer of embedded electronic systems and critical electronic solutions, announced its unaudited financial results for the half year ended September 30, 2025.Financial Highlights – H1 FY26 (YoY Comparison)Revenue from Operations rose to ₹815.45 million, up from ₹497.53 million in H1 FY25, marking a 63.90% year-on-year growth.EBITDA increased to ₹217.34 million, compared to ₹142 million in the same period last year.EBITDA Margin stood at 26.65%, compared to 28.54% in H1 FY25, with the decline attributed to ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Gateway Distriparks Announces Q2 FY25 Results

Gateway Distriparks Limited (GDL), one of India’s leading multimodal logistics providers, announced its financial results for the quarter ended 30 September 2025.For Q2, the company reported total revenue of INR 154.8 crore (H1: INR 316.9 crore), EBITDA of INR 20.56 crore (H1: INR 45.65 crore), PBT of INR –4.23 crore (H1: INR –0.28 crore), and PAT of INR –2.91 crore (H1: INR –0.37 crore). The company stated that these numbers reflect the consolidation of accounts following Snowman Logistics transitioning from an associate company to a subsidiary in December 2024.Commenting on the per..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Last-Mile Connectivity a Prime Focus, Says Ms. Ashwini Bhide,

The IMC Chamber of Commerce and Industry (IMC) hosted a high-impact Managing Committee session today on the theme “Mumbai Metro: Transforming Connectivity and Commuting.” The session featured an insightful address by Ms. Ashwini Bhide, Managing Director, Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (MMRCL), who shared updates on key transport infrastructure developments across Mumbai and the MMR region.Emphasising the city’s critical economic role, Ms. Bhide noted, “Mumbai is the economic powerhouse of Maharashtra, with more than 95% of the region’s population living in urban areas. As Maharas..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement