Major ports experiment with O&M model for cargo terminal privatisation
PORTS & SHIPPING

Major ports experiment with O&M model for cargo terminal privatisation

State-owned major ports in India have begun exploring the operation and maintenance (O&M) model as an alternative to the public-private partnership (PPP) framework for privatizing cargo terminals. This shift is seen as a way to reduce risks and litigation compared to traditional PPP agreements.

Under the PPP model, cargo handling contracts are awarded to private firms for a 30-year period based on a detailed concession agreement. In contrast, O&M contracts are typically awarded for 5-10 years.

Last week, the Visakhapatnam Port Authority awarded an O&M contract to local stevedoring company Green Energy Resources Ports Pvt Ltd. This contract allows the company to operate the port’s East Quay 1A (EQ1A) berth by installing harbor mobile cranes (HMC) for five years, with an option to extend for an additional year.

Previously, the port authority selected SEW Infrastructure Ltd to construct a fully mechanized coal handling terminal under the PPP model, but the 30-year concession was terminated after SEW exited the project midway. The port authority then invested its own funds to complete the berth and prepare it for operations.

The port authority will levy tariffs from terminal users, sharing approximately Rs 15-16 per ton with Green Energy Resources, the O&M operator.

Over two years ago, Visakhapatnam Port Authority engaged HIQ Services to manage the East Quay 1 (EQ1) terminal using the O&M model. Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd (APSEZ) previously operated the EQ1 terminal for seven years until the 30-year concession was terminated in 2021 due to APSEZ's failure to meet minimum guaranteed throughput obligations for three consecutive years.

After terminating the concession, the port authority compensated APSEZ Rs 155 crores, covering 90% of the debt due. Currently, Visakhapatnam Port Authority charges around Rs 260 per ton for cargo handling, from which it pays Rs 61 (including GST) to HIQ Services, allowing the authority to earn approximately Rs 200 per ton. This has helped generate about Rs 80 crores annually, with the facility handling around two million tonnes (mt) of cargo in FY24.

The revenue from the O&M model has enabled the port authority to recover the termination payment made to APSEZ. “The EQ1 terminal is now the most revenue-earning terminal at Visakhapatnam Port,” stated a source.

The source emphasized that the O&M model has proven to be more profitable for major ports than the PPP model. Following the success of the O&M model at EQ1 and EQ1A, the port authority plans to privatize West Quay berths 1, 2, and 3 using the same approach, which was initially intended to follow the PPP model.

Visakhapatnam Port has faced challenges with contract terminations, with at least three PPP projects halted for various reasons, leading to lengthy arbitration and litigation. As a result, the port authority is shifting exclusively to the O&M model for privatizing cargo terminals.

Similarly, Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Authority (formerly Kolkata Port Trust) has also adopted the O&M model for berth privatization. Recently, APSEZ secured rights to handle containers from five berths at Netaji Subhas Dock of Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Authority on an O&M basis for five years, quoting Rs 2,100 per twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU).

Deendayal Port Authority in Kandla, Gujarat, is also considering the O&M model for one of its planned new berths.

An official from a major port emphasized that the O&M model significantly reduces risk and administrative burden for ports. He believes this model represents the future of port asset privatization, arguing against the necessity of private funding for the mechanization and operation of existing brownfield assets under the PPP framework.

“The O&M model is part of privatization; it will be a government facility operated by a private firm for 5-10 years,” he noted, emphasizing that this approach allows the port authority to maintain control over the terminal.

However, private port operators suggest that the O&M model is best suited for small brownfield cargo handling facilities and may not be applicable for developing new terminals that require significant funding.

State-owned major ports in India have begun exploring the operation and maintenance (O&M) model as an alternative to the public-private partnership (PPP) framework for privatizing cargo terminals. This shift is seen as a way to reduce risks and litigation compared to traditional PPP agreements. Under the PPP model, cargo handling contracts are awarded to private firms for a 30-year period based on a detailed concession agreement. In contrast, O&M contracts are typically awarded for 5-10 years. Last week, the Visakhapatnam Port Authority awarded an O&M contract to local stevedoring company Green Energy Resources Ports Pvt Ltd. This contract allows the company to operate the port’s East Quay 1A (EQ1A) berth by installing harbor mobile cranes (HMC) for five years, with an option to extend for an additional year. Previously, the port authority selected SEW Infrastructure Ltd to construct a fully mechanized coal handling terminal under the PPP model, but the 30-year concession was terminated after SEW exited the project midway. The port authority then invested its own funds to complete the berth and prepare it for operations. The port authority will levy tariffs from terminal users, sharing approximately Rs 15-16 per ton with Green Energy Resources, the O&M operator. Over two years ago, Visakhapatnam Port Authority engaged HIQ Services to manage the East Quay 1 (EQ1) terminal using the O&M model. Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd (APSEZ) previously operated the EQ1 terminal for seven years until the 30-year concession was terminated in 2021 due to APSEZ's failure to meet minimum guaranteed throughput obligations for three consecutive years. After terminating the concession, the port authority compensated APSEZ Rs 155 crores, covering 90% of the debt due. Currently, Visakhapatnam Port Authority charges around Rs 260 per ton for cargo handling, from which it pays Rs 61 (including GST) to HIQ Services, allowing the authority to earn approximately Rs 200 per ton. This has helped generate about Rs 80 crores annually, with the facility handling around two million tonnes (mt) of cargo in FY24. The revenue from the O&M model has enabled the port authority to recover the termination payment made to APSEZ. “The EQ1 terminal is now the most revenue-earning terminal at Visakhapatnam Port,” stated a source. The source emphasized that the O&M model has proven to be more profitable for major ports than the PPP model. Following the success of the O&M model at EQ1 and EQ1A, the port authority plans to privatize West Quay berths 1, 2, and 3 using the same approach, which was initially intended to follow the PPP model. Visakhapatnam Port has faced challenges with contract terminations, with at least three PPP projects halted for various reasons, leading to lengthy arbitration and litigation. As a result, the port authority is shifting exclusively to the O&M model for privatizing cargo terminals. Similarly, Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Authority (formerly Kolkata Port Trust) has also adopted the O&M model for berth privatization. Recently, APSEZ secured rights to handle containers from five berths at Netaji Subhas Dock of Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Authority on an O&M basis for five years, quoting Rs 2,100 per twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU). Deendayal Port Authority in Kandla, Gujarat, is also considering the O&M model for one of its planned new berths. An official from a major port emphasized that the O&M model significantly reduces risk and administrative burden for ports. He believes this model represents the future of port asset privatization, arguing against the necessity of private funding for the mechanization and operation of existing brownfield assets under the PPP framework. “The O&M model is part of privatization; it will be a government facility operated by a private firm for 5-10 years,” he noted, emphasizing that this approach allows the port authority to maintain control over the terminal. However, private port operators suggest that the O&M model is best suited for small brownfield cargo handling facilities and may not be applicable for developing new terminals that require significant funding.

Next Story
Building Material

Jindal Stainless Launches First Stainless Steel Fabrication Unit in Mumbai

Jindal Stainless, India’s largest stainless steel manufacturer, through its subsidiary Jindal Stainless Steelway (JSSL), has inaugurated its first stainless steel fabrication unit at Washivali, Patalganga, Mumbai. The 4 lakh sq ft facility is designed to serve the bridge sector, fabricating critical components such as girders, arches, nuts, bolts, and handles. The unit was inaugurated by CEO & CFO Tarun Khulbe in the presence of senior leadership.Developed with an initial investment of Rs 1.25 billion, the facility strengthens Jindal Stainless’ position as a provider of end-to-end fabr..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Hero Future Energies Secures Rs 19.08 Bn for 120 MW Hybrid Project

Hero Future Energies (HFE), through its SPV Clean Renewable Energy Hybrid Three, has secured Rs 19,080 million in funding from State Bank of India (lead) and Canara Bank for the development of its 120 MW renewable energy (RE) hybrid project in Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh.The project, contracted with SJVN, integrates wind, solar, and storage technologies to provide reliable peak power. The funding, structured with a 21-year repayment tenure, will support timely project execution and the commencement of commercial operations.This financial closure underscores the banking community’s confidence in ..

Next Story
Equipment

SANY India Opens New 3S Branches in Visakhapatnam and Palwancha

SANY India, a leading manufacturer of construction, mining, road, logistics, and energy equipment, has expanded its presence in southern India by inaugurating two new 3S (Sales, Service, Spares) branch offices in Visakhapatnam (Andhra Pradesh) and Palwancha (Telangana). The expansion, in partnership with its authorised dealer Madhura Engineering Services, reinforces SANY’s commitment to providing world-class equipment and faster service access in key industrial and mining hubs.These new facilities complement Madhura Engineering’s existing branches in Guntur and Vijayawada, marking a strate..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?