Ministry Faces Backlash Over Push to Scrap 5% IGST on Ship Imports
PORTS & SHIPPING

Ministry Faces Backlash Over Push to Scrap 5% IGST on Ship Imports

The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways has sought the Finance Ministry's support to eliminate the 5% Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on ships imported and registered under the Indian flag. The move aims to boost local tonnage but has sparked resistance from the domestic shipbuilding industry, which views the levy as crucial for its protection. Domestic shipbuilders argue that the IGST discourages the import of foreign-built ships by making them slightly more expensive, thus incentivising the use of locally manufactured vessels. A shipyard executive emphasised that the tax supports domestic shipbuilders and aligns with government initiatives like 'Make in India' and the Maritime India Vision 2030. However, the Ministry justifies its demand by highlighting the challenges faced by Indian fleet owners. Imported ships, especially second-hand vessels, dominate the Indian market due to immediate demand and cost considerations. The IGST, the Ministry contends, imposes a cash flow burden on shipowners, with unutilised GST credits worth approximately Rs 1 billion lying interest-free with the government. The Ministry further argues that the IGST creates a competitive disadvantage for Indian ships against foreign-owned vessels, which operate in Indian waters without such levies. It claims this imbalance discourages the registration of new-build ships under the Indian flag, with nearly no such registrations in the past decade. Shipbuilders counter that removing the IGST would make imported ships cheaper, potentially harming the local industry. They assert that the tax enables them to claim input tax credits, reducing production costs and maintaining competitiveness. Without it, shipbuilders would face higher costs, impacting their working capital and making Indian-built ships less competitive. The debate also touches on India's commitment to green shipping. Critics of the IGST waiver highlight the reliance on older, less efficient second-hand ships, which contradicts global trends toward fuel efficiency and carbon reduction. As the Ministry urges the Finance Ministry to present the matter to the GST Council, the outcome will likely influence India's maritime industry dynamics, balancing fleet expansion, domestic manufacturing, and sustainability goals. (ET)

The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways has sought the Finance Ministry's support to eliminate the 5% Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on ships imported and registered under the Indian flag. The move aims to boost local tonnage but has sparked resistance from the domestic shipbuilding industry, which views the levy as crucial for its protection. Domestic shipbuilders argue that the IGST discourages the import of foreign-built ships by making them slightly more expensive, thus incentivising the use of locally manufactured vessels. A shipyard executive emphasised that the tax supports domestic shipbuilders and aligns with government initiatives like 'Make in India' and the Maritime India Vision 2030. However, the Ministry justifies its demand by highlighting the challenges faced by Indian fleet owners. Imported ships, especially second-hand vessels, dominate the Indian market due to immediate demand and cost considerations. The IGST, the Ministry contends, imposes a cash flow burden on shipowners, with unutilised GST credits worth approximately Rs 1 billion lying interest-free with the government. The Ministry further argues that the IGST creates a competitive disadvantage for Indian ships against foreign-owned vessels, which operate in Indian waters without such levies. It claims this imbalance discourages the registration of new-build ships under the Indian flag, with nearly no such registrations in the past decade. Shipbuilders counter that removing the IGST would make imported ships cheaper, potentially harming the local industry. They assert that the tax enables them to claim input tax credits, reducing production costs and maintaining competitiveness. Without it, shipbuilders would face higher costs, impacting their working capital and making Indian-built ships less competitive. The debate also touches on India's commitment to green shipping. Critics of the IGST waiver highlight the reliance on older, less efficient second-hand ships, which contradicts global trends toward fuel efficiency and carbon reduction. As the Ministry urges the Finance Ministry to present the matter to the GST Council, the outcome will likely influence India's maritime industry dynamics, balancing fleet expansion, domestic manufacturing, and sustainability goals. (ET)

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?