Code of Conduct
Real Estate

Code of Conduct

Together, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Real-Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 will bring positive change to the interaction between home buyers and developers. While the objective of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (‘Code’) is ...

Together, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and the Real-Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 will bring positive change to the interaction between home buyers and developers. While the objective of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (‘Code’) is to provide a framework relating to reorganisation and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and individuals in a timebound manner for maximisation of value of assets of the preceding class of such persons, thereby considering the interest of all the stakeholders in a resolution process, the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016 (‘RERA’) was enacted as a beneficial legislation to protect the interests of the consumer/allottees and to regulate and promote the real-estate sector, making developers-promoters accountable to their ultimate buyers, thereby bringing in transparency in real-estate projects. Need for inclusion of allottees (‘Home Buyers’) of real-estate project as Financial Creditors under the CodeIn the recent past, the unscrupulous activity and diversion of funds by the developers in the timely handing over of possession of flats to Home Buyers left them suffering. The rulings of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and the Apex Court in Nikhil Mehta v. AMR Infrastructure, Anil Mahindroo v. Earth Iconic Infrastructures, Jaypee Infratech (Chitra Sharma and ors. v. Union of India and ors.) and Amrapali Group (Bikram Chatterjee v. Union of India) have acted as a trigger for the 2018 Amendment in the Code after recognising the plight of Home Buyers.The amendments The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act 2018 (‘2018 Amendment’) added an explanation to include an allottee of a real-estate project as a Financial Creditor and clearly provided that any amount raised from such an allottee shall be deemed to have the commercial effect of a borrowing. It also conferred allottees the right of representation in the Committee of Creditors (‘COC’) by an authorised representative.Developers have challenged the 2018 Amendment before the Apex Court on various grounds. In Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure and ors. v. Union of India (‘Pioneer’), the Apex Court, while deciding the challenge, relied on the recommendations of the Insolvency Law Committee, which deliberated on the meaning of ‘Financial Debt’ and non-inclusion of Home Buyers either under the definition of ‘financial’ or ‘operational’ creditors, and concluded that it is prudent to include an explanation that such creditors (i.e. Home Buyers) fall within the definition of Financial Creditors. The thrust was to understand that allottees who give advances to developers to undertake a real-estate project are actually financing the developer to complete the project. Therefore, they fall within the definition of a Financial Creditor and the matter comes under the ambit of a ‘Financial Debt’.While upholding the validity of the 2018 Amendment, the Apex Court considered the view that inclusion of Home Buyers and their entitlement of representation under COC might possibly result in malicious filings by Home Buyers, and thus laid down factors to be considered so that a genuine developer/builder is not harassed by an erring allottee who has initiated a Section 7 IBC proceeding only to seek refund or coerce a serious developer to cough up the monies the developer was entitled to take from such a Home Buyer. The Apex Court has stressed that the National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT’), while deciding an application of Home Buyers under the Code, will inter alia include verifying the claim of such Home Buyers, whether they are defaulters and entitled to a refund or whether the insolvency process has been invoked with malicious intent or by a speculative investor who is seeking redressal as a coercive measure.In the meanwhile, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act 2019 (‘2019 Amendment’) also received the President's assent on August 5, 2019, which fortifies the Home Buyers’ claim as a Financial Creditor and clarifies that an authorised representative of a particular class of Financial Creditors (in this case, of Home Buyers) shall be entitled to vote in the COC on behalf of all the Home Buyers and  consider the majority decision of the Home Buyers which decision shall be construed in terms of 50 per cent of voting share of such class of Home Buyers.Approaches of IBC and RERA: Differences and overlaps After the 2018 Amendment and 2019 Amendment to the Code, genuine Home Buyers have multiple options to redress their grievances, be it an IBC proceeding for refund of legitimate monies advanced to a developer or the option to go to RERA to get possession of the premises or compensation or both, or avail a suitable remedy under the Consumer Protection Act 1986 for deficiency in the services of a developer. However, the duty would be cast on Home Buyers as to the ultimate remedy they wish to seek; only thereafter, should they initiate proceedings before the appropriate forum. There are bound to be overlaps with regard to which forum is apt but the Apex Court has given a few examples as to what relief under the Code can be entertained by NCLT. We may clarify that in cases of builders’ incapacitation to complete a project, the best recourse would be under the provisions of the Code. In conclusionIn the Amrapali matter, the Apex Court cancelled the RERA registration of the projects and appointed NBCC to complete the construction, thus protecting the Home Buyers. Although the Apex Court has given direction to build a robust infrastructure so that NCLT is equipped to handle the Home Buyers’ application, it will be a challenge to decide the numerous petitions that are expected to be filed considering the present state of the economy. While genuine developers who have complied with the provisions of the law and performed their obligations need not worry, the fulsome rights given to an allottee may, in certain cases, make developers extra cautious regarding compliance rather than focusing on the actual completion of the project. A developer that should ideally put its energies in the project may become a victim to proceedings from various corners by an allottee who just wishes to harass the developer. However, the amendments in the Code and RERA will bring in a lot of positive change where the project will be completed in time and allottee who are sincere about getting their units will get their dream homes in time. In future, these initiatives will surely change the mindset of both the developer and the Home Buyer. 

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

RVNL secures Rs 1.65 billion railway bridge project from North Eastern Railway

Rail Vikas Nigam (RVNL) has received a Letter of Award (LoA) from North Eastern Railway for a Rs 1.65 billion railway infrastructure project, strengthening its order book and showcasing its expertise in complex railway construction.The project involves constructing the substructure of a major railway bridge over the Gandak River, located between Paniyahwa and Valmikinagar stations. This is part of the doubling of the Gorakhpur Cantt–Valmikinagar railway section, aimed at improving line capacity and operational efficiency.The bridge will feature 14 spans of 61 metres each, built on double D-t..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Raebareli’s Modern Coach Factory rolls out 15,000th railway coach

The Modern Coach Factory (MCF) at Raebareli in Uttar Pradesh has achieved a major manufacturing milestone with the rollout of its 15,000th railway coach on December 15, the Ministry of Railways said.In a press note, the ministry said that MCF has already produced 1,310 coaches in the current financial year 2025–26, reflecting sustained high output at one of Indian Railways’ most advanced passenger coach manufacturing units.Established in 2007 at Lalganj in Raebareli district, MCF was built at a cost of Rs 31.92 billion with an initial annual production capacity of 1,000 coaches. The factor..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

RailTel wins Rs 260.88 million IT infrastructure order from VOC Port

Navratna public sector undertaking RailTel Corporation of India has secured an IT infrastructure order worth Rs 260.88 million from V.O. Chidambaranar Port Authority (VOC Port), strengthening its presence in port-led digital transformation projects.According to an exchange filing dated December 16, 2025, RailTel has received a Letter of Acceptance (LoA) from VOC Port Authority for the implementation of advanced IT infrastructure at the port. The project is domestic in nature and is scheduled to be completed by August 15, 2026.The company said the order has been awarded in the normal course of ..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Open In App