SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit.

Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services.

The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest.

The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT.

The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services.

However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports.

(Business Standard)

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit. Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest. The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT. The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services. However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports. (Business Standard)

Next Story
Technology

AI-Enabled Workflows Lift Profitability and Productivity

Organisations modernising frontline workflows with artificial intelligence, automation and real-time data are reporting stronger financial performance, higher productivity and improved employee engagement, according to a global study by Zebra Technologies and Oxford Economics.The research covered 1,000 senior leaders across retail, manufacturing, transportation and logistics in the US, Mexico, the UK, Germany, India, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.In transportation and logistics, 54 per cent of companies that improved picking and packing operations reported faster operational performance, wh..

Next Story
Real Estate

India Leads Global AI Readiness but Implementation Lags

Indian companies lead global averages across all eight artificial intelligence readiness indicators tracked by JLL, but only 19 per cent have started making changes to their workplaces, according to the JLL 2026 Future of Work Survey.The study found that 77 per cent of Indian business leaders expect AI to change their office requirements, creating a 58-percentage-point gap between awareness and implementation. The survey covered more than 2,200 CEOs, CFOs and real estate leaders across 21 countries during the first quarter of 2026.Despite concerns over automation, 58 per cent of Indian leaders..

Next Story
Equipment

Three WOLFF Cranes Build Riyadh Cable-Stayed Bridges

Three WOLFF 180 B luffing jib cranes are supporting the construction of two cable-stayed bridges alongside the existing Wadi Laban Bridge in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The project is being developed for the Royal Commission for Riyadh City and executed by the ICRC joint venture comprising IC Ictas and Al Rashid Trading & Contracting Company.The cranes are handling lifting operations including formwork, reinforcement, concrete placement, work platforms, surveying equipment and other construction materials. Each crane is fitted with a 40 m jib, reaches a hook height of 157 m and offers a maximum ..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement