SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit.

Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services.

The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest.

The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT.

The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services.

However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports.

(Business Standard)

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit. Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest. The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT. The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services. However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports. (Business Standard)

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code