Tribunal favours petitioners in Rajasthan power surcharge row
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

Tribunal favours petitioners in Rajasthan power surcharge row

The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) recently ruled that the state regulatory commission should revisit the subject of cross-subsidy surcharge on open access projects in Rajasthan as and when it takes up the tariff determination exercise in the future.

Rajasthan Textile Mills Association, Vedanta, Lord Chloro Alkali, Sunil Healthcare, Synergy Steels, Ambuja Cements, and Ultratech Cement had petitioned APTEL to assess the legitimacy of the state regulator’s determination of the cross-subsidy surcharge for the financial year (FY) 2016-17.

The petitioners have industrial units located in Rajasthan that have been granted open access within the contract demand and are drawing electricity through open access, including from power exchanges.

They challenged the state commission for hiking the cross-subsidy surcharge from Rs 0.18 ($0.002)/kWh, Rs 0.13 ($0.001)/kWh, and Rs 0.05 ($0.0006)/kWh for 132 kV consumers, 33 kV consumers, and 11 kV consumers to Rs 1.63 ($0.021)/kWh, Rs 1.39 ($0.017)/kWh, and Rs 0.83 ($0.01)/kWh.

The tribunal observed that the rates of cross-subsidy surcharge under the previous determination were Rs 0.18 ($0.002)/kWh for 132 kV consumers, Rs 0.13 ($0.001)/kWh for 33 kV consumers, and Rs 0.05 ($0.0006)/kWh for 11 kV consumers.

APTEL stated that the rates of cross-subsidy surcharge should not have been tampered with and it is unjust, unfair, and violates the prescribed norms and procedures and so it is set aside.

The tribunal directed the state commission to revisit the cross-subsidy surcharge when it takes up tariff determination in the future.

See also:
JSW Paints files appeal against Asian Paints
Adani to double cement making capacity to 140 MT


The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) recently ruled that the state regulatory commission should revisit the subject of cross-subsidy surcharge on open access projects in Rajasthan as and when it takes up the tariff determination exercise in the future. Rajasthan Textile Mills Association, Vedanta, Lord Chloro Alkali, Sunil Healthcare, Synergy Steels, Ambuja Cements, and Ultratech Cement had petitioned APTEL to assess the legitimacy of the state regulator’s determination of the cross-subsidy surcharge for the financial year (FY) 2016-17. The petitioners have industrial units located in Rajasthan that have been granted open access within the contract demand and are drawing electricity through open access, including from power exchanges. They challenged the state commission for hiking the cross-subsidy surcharge from Rs 0.18 ($0.002)/kWh, Rs 0.13 ($0.001)/kWh, and Rs 0.05 ($0.0006)/kWh for 132 kV consumers, 33 kV consumers, and 11 kV consumers to Rs 1.63 ($0.021)/kWh, Rs 1.39 ($0.017)/kWh, and Rs 0.83 ($0.01)/kWh. The tribunal observed that the rates of cross-subsidy surcharge under the previous determination were Rs 0.18 ($0.002)/kWh for 132 kV consumers, Rs 0.13 ($0.001)/kWh for 33 kV consumers, and Rs 0.05 ($0.0006)/kWh for 11 kV consumers. APTEL stated that the rates of cross-subsidy surcharge should not have been tampered with and it is unjust, unfair, and violates the prescribed norms and procedures and so it is set aside. The tribunal directed the state commission to revisit the cross-subsidy surcharge when it takes up tariff determination in the future. See also: JSW Paints files appeal against Asian PaintsAdani to double cement making capacity to 140 MT

Next Story
Building Material

Beyond Basics: Unique Ideas for Using Distemper Paint Colours in Your Home

Rohit and Nisha had just moved into their first rented apartment in Pune. The place had everything they wanted. Great sunlight, a tiny balcony, and affordable rent. But the walls? A dull, ugly and patchy beige that made even their colourful paintings look tired. “Let’s colour the walls,” Nisha said enthusiastically. Rohit looked at her with a calculator in hand. “You mean spend half our salary on emulsions?”Just then, their neighbour popped in and said, “I have been using distemper paint on walls for years. It is affordable, looks good, and you can wipe it clean when your friends s..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

REC Approves Rs 75 billifor Brookfield’s Hybrid Energy Project

The Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) Ltd, a Maharatna non-banking finance company, has sanctioned Rs 75 billion for Brookfield’s 1,040 MW hybrid renewable energy project in Kurnool district — its largest-ever funding to a private-sector venture.Developed by Evren, a joint venture between Brookfield (51.49 per cent) and Axis Energy, the Rs 99.1 billion project integrates 640 MW of wind and 400 MW of solar power with battery storage. It is India’s first Firm and Dispatchable Renewable Energy (FDRE) project featuring state-level grid connectivity and a dedicated power purchase agreem..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Oswal Energies, Deendayal Port Partner for Green Hydrogen Project

Oswal Energies and the Deendayal Port Authority (Kandla-Gandhidham) have signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to jointly develop green hydrogen, green methanol, green ammonia, and a 100 million litres per day (MLD) desalination plant under the National Green Energy Initiative.The Government of India has identified Deendayal Port as one of the strategic hubs for green energy infrastructure. The collaboration aims to strengthen the port’s role in advancing sustainable energy systems, supporting India’s net-zero and energy security goals.Under the MoU, Oswal Energies will lead the devel..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement