Bhubaneswar ADM Serves Notice to Builder for Defying ORERA Order
Real Estate

Bhubaneswar ADM Serves Notice to Builder for Defying ORERA Order

A city-based real estate developer has been issued a show-cause notice by the Additional District Magistrate (ADM) of Bhubaneswar for failing to comply with an order from the Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority (ORERA). The order directed the developer to compensate aggrieved homebuyers in connection with a case from 2019.

Sources revealed that the developer had undertaken a multi-storied housing project in Ghatikia but did not deliver the houses within the promised timeframe. This delay prompted 18 homebuyers to file a complaint with ORERA, which subsequently ordered the developer to pay compensation amounting to Rs 87.94 lakh. Although the developer appealed the order at the Odisha Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (OREAT), the tribunal dismissed the appeal, reaffirming ORERA's verdict in favour of the homebuyers.

In a recent move, the ADM issued a show-cause notice to the developer, questioning why an arrest warrant should not be issued for repeated non-compliance with the ORERA order. The notice stated that the developer had failed to settle the Rs 87.94 lakh compensation and warned that the execution of the case might lead to arrest and imprisonment. The developer was instructed to appear before the court on December 31 to provide an explanation and avoid potential civil imprisonment.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of India had ordered the attachment of the developer’s movable and immovable assets following a plea by one of the homebuyers concerning delays in receiving their house. The court’s intervention was seen as a significant step toward ensuring justice for homebuyers.

Commenting on the situation, Bimalendu Pradhan, one of the affected buyers, described it as a positive development for homebuyers seeking resolution of their grievances. He emphasized that while favorable orders are often issued, their execution remains a challenge. Pradhan highlighted that the ADM is responsible for enforcing recoveries and pointed out that the Supreme Court has mandated such orders be executed within six months, though the actual execution rate is alarmingly low at less than 2 per cent.

Meanwhile, ORERA has recently released a list of 57 promoters who failed to pay penalties imposed for violating provisions of the Odisha Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Records show that penalties totalling Rs 60.89 million were levied on 60 realtors, but only Rs 2.3 million has been recovered to date. Of these, merely three promoters have complied with the penalty orders.

A city-based real estate developer has been issued a show-cause notice by the Additional District Magistrate (ADM) of Bhubaneswar for failing to comply with an order from the Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority (ORERA). The order directed the developer to compensate aggrieved homebuyers in connection with a case from 2019. Sources revealed that the developer had undertaken a multi-storied housing project in Ghatikia but did not deliver the houses within the promised timeframe. This delay prompted 18 homebuyers to file a complaint with ORERA, which subsequently ordered the developer to pay compensation amounting to Rs 87.94 lakh. Although the developer appealed the order at the Odisha Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (OREAT), the tribunal dismissed the appeal, reaffirming ORERA's verdict in favour of the homebuyers. In a recent move, the ADM issued a show-cause notice to the developer, questioning why an arrest warrant should not be issued for repeated non-compliance with the ORERA order. The notice stated that the developer had failed to settle the Rs 87.94 lakh compensation and warned that the execution of the case might lead to arrest and imprisonment. The developer was instructed to appear before the court on December 31 to provide an explanation and avoid potential civil imprisonment. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of India had ordered the attachment of the developer’s movable and immovable assets following a plea by one of the homebuyers concerning delays in receiving their house. The court’s intervention was seen as a significant step toward ensuring justice for homebuyers. Commenting on the situation, Bimalendu Pradhan, one of the affected buyers, described it as a positive development for homebuyers seeking resolution of their grievances. He emphasized that while favorable orders are often issued, their execution remains a challenge. Pradhan highlighted that the ADM is responsible for enforcing recoveries and pointed out that the Supreme Court has mandated such orders be executed within six months, though the actual execution rate is alarmingly low at less than 2 per cent. Meanwhile, ORERA has recently released a list of 57 promoters who failed to pay penalties imposed for violating provisions of the Odisha Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Records show that penalties totalling Rs 60.89 million were levied on 60 realtors, but only Rs 2.3 million has been recovered to date. Of these, merely three promoters have complied with the penalty orders.

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?