Bombay High Court Criticizes Maharashtra Slum Policy
Real Estate

Bombay High Court Criticizes Maharashtra Slum Policy

In a significant judgement, the Bombay High Court termed Maharashtra's slum policy as "strange" and lamented that an international city like Mumbai is known for its slums. A division bench of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Jitendra Jain criticized the policy that grants free tenements to encroachers, highlighting the detrimental impact on both public and private land ownership.

The court pointed out that this policy has led to substantial tracts of land being diverted from the "state pool," affecting future generations. It emphasized the need for a thorough reassessment of such government policies, noting the severe consequences for Mumbai's urban landscape.

Once slums on private land are recognized under the Slum Act, the encroachment becomes a legitimate right to free tenement for the encroachers, the court observed. This, according to the bench, effectively rewards illegal encroachment, compromising the rights of rightful landowners.

Highlighting the challenge of evicting encroachers, the court expressed concern over the disappearance of major public lands in Mumbai, now subject to private development under the guise of slum redevelopment. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA), the court noted, bears a significant responsibility to protect property rights objectively and lawfully.

The bench quashed an October 2021 notice from the SRA seeking to acquire land from the Mount Mary Church trust in Bandra for a slum redevelopment project, declaring the acquisition "patently illegal." The court was responding to a petition from Bishop John Rodrigues, representing the church trust, challenging the SRA's move to acquire 1,596 square meters of their land.

The judges reiterated that slum-dwellers are entitled only to permanent alternate accommodation under statutory schemes, not ownership rights over the land. They criticized the state policy for encouraging widespread encroachment, resulting in significant losses for both public and private landowners.

The court underscored the need for a comprehensive review of these policies to safeguard the rights of future generations and ensure adherence to constitutional principles. Acknowledging the necessity of housing for a large migrant workforce, the bench stressed that this should not come at the expense of violating property rights and legal principles.

In conclusion, the court highlighted the complex reality of removing encroachments in Mumbai, noting the involvement of slumlords, criminals, social workers, and politicians who exploit these situations for electoral gains. The court's remarks call for immediate and thoughtful policy revisions to address these deep-seated urban challenges.

In a significant judgement, the Bombay High Court termed Maharashtra's slum policy as strange and lamented that an international city like Mumbai is known for its slums. A division bench of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Jitendra Jain criticized the policy that grants free tenements to encroachers, highlighting the detrimental impact on both public and private land ownership. The court pointed out that this policy has led to substantial tracts of land being diverted from the state pool, affecting future generations. It emphasized the need for a thorough reassessment of such government policies, noting the severe consequences for Mumbai's urban landscape. Once slums on private land are recognized under the Slum Act, the encroachment becomes a legitimate right to free tenement for the encroachers, the court observed. This, according to the bench, effectively rewards illegal encroachment, compromising the rights of rightful landowners. Highlighting the challenge of evicting encroachers, the court expressed concern over the disappearance of major public lands in Mumbai, now subject to private development under the guise of slum redevelopment. The Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA), the court noted, bears a significant responsibility to protect property rights objectively and lawfully. The bench quashed an October 2021 notice from the SRA seeking to acquire land from the Mount Mary Church trust in Bandra for a slum redevelopment project, declaring the acquisition patently illegal. The court was responding to a petition from Bishop John Rodrigues, representing the church trust, challenging the SRA's move to acquire 1,596 square meters of their land. The judges reiterated that slum-dwellers are entitled only to permanent alternate accommodation under statutory schemes, not ownership rights over the land. They criticized the state policy for encouraging widespread encroachment, resulting in significant losses for both public and private landowners. The court underscored the need for a comprehensive review of these policies to safeguard the rights of future generations and ensure adherence to constitutional principles. Acknowledging the necessity of housing for a large migrant workforce, the bench stressed that this should not come at the expense of violating property rights and legal principles. In conclusion, the court highlighted the complex reality of removing encroachments in Mumbai, noting the involvement of slumlords, criminals, social workers, and politicians who exploit these situations for electoral gains. The court's remarks call for immediate and thoughtful policy revisions to address these deep-seated urban challenges.

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Tata, Airbus to Build India’s First Private Helicopter Line

In a landmark development for India’s aerospace sector, Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL) and Airbus will establish the country’s first private-sector helicopter assembly line in Vemagal, Karnataka. The facility will manufacture the Airbus H125 and H125M, marking a significant milestone in India’s push for self-reliance in aviation and defence manufacturing. The new Final Assembly Line (FAL) will produce the H125, the world’s best-selling single-engine helicopter, known for its versatility and performance in extreme environments. The first ‘Made in India’ H125 is expected to ro..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

NeGD to Support Bharat Taxi in Building Cooperative Ride Platform

In a significant move for India’s digital and mobility transformation, the National e-Governance Division (NeGD) of the Digital India Corporation, under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), has entered into an advisory partnership with Sahakar Taxi Cooperative Limited, the company behind Bharat Taxi — a first-of-its-kind, cooperative-led national ride-hailing platform. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) has been signed between NeGD and Sahakar Taxi to provide strategic advisory and technical support covering key areas such as platform integration, cybersecurity..

Next Story
Technology

MeitY Hosts Pre-Summit for India–AI Impact Summit 2026

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India, hosted a series of Pre-Summit events for the upcoming India–AI Impact Summit 2026 at the India Mobile Congress (IMC) 2025 in New Delhi. These sessions mark a key milestone ahead of the main summit, scheduled for 19–20 February 2026 at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi. Delivering the inaugural address, S. Krishnan, Secretary, MeitY, highlighted India’s innovative and frugal approach to AI development. “We have adopted innovative means by learning from others’ experiences to build projects and products that..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?