ED Files PMLA Complaint Against Hyderabad's Sahiti Infratec and MD
Real Estate

ED Files PMLA Complaint Against Hyderabad's Sahiti Infratec and MD

The Hyderabad Zonal Office of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) filed a prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against Sahiti Infratec Ventures India (SIVIPL) and its Managing Director, B Lakshminarayana, before the metropolitan sessions judge court in Hyderabad. The court acknowledged the case on December 4, 2024.

The ED's investigation stemmed from an FIR registered by the Telangana police, which alleged that SIVIPL, B Lakshminarayana, and others had promoted a pre-launch offer for a world-class residential gated community. The company reportedly collected substantial amounts from potential buyers but failed to deliver the promised flats or refund the money, causing financial losses to the buyers. Additional FIRs were subsequently filed by investors and buyers linked to various projects undertaken by SIVIPL and its group entities.

The ED's inquiry revealed that SIVIPL did not have the requisite approvals from RERA and HMDA for the project. Additionally, there was no escrow account, and the funds collected from investors were deposited into multiple bank accounts and received in cash. The investigation uncovered proceeds of crime amounting to Rs 8.42 billion, with Rs 2.17 billion collected in unaccounted cash, which was allegedly concealed and used for personal purposes by the company's promoters and directors.

Further findings indicated that the funds were diverted through fraudulent banking transactions to both related and unrelated entities, with no legitimate business purpose. A substantial portion of the money was withdrawn in cash and transferred to overseas bank accounts belonging to B Lakshminarayana and his relatives.

The investigation also highlighted that the embezzlement of homebuyers' funds was carried out by B Lakshminarayana in collaboration with Sandu Purnachandra Rao, a former director of SIVIPL and the head of its sales and marketing team. The misappropriated funds were reportedly used to purchase immovable properties in the names of benami entities.

During the investigation, the ED conducted searches at various locations, seizing incriminating materials and digital devices, and freezing multiple bank accounts. Additionally, movable and immovable properties worth Rs 1.61 billion were provisionally attached. B Lakshminarayana was arrested under the provisions of the PMLA in September 2024.

The Hyderabad Zonal Office of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) filed a prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against Sahiti Infratec Ventures India (SIVIPL) and its Managing Director, B Lakshminarayana, before the metropolitan sessions judge court in Hyderabad. The court acknowledged the case on December 4, 2024. The ED's investigation stemmed from an FIR registered by the Telangana police, which alleged that SIVIPL, B Lakshminarayana, and others had promoted a pre-launch offer for a world-class residential gated community. The company reportedly collected substantial amounts from potential buyers but failed to deliver the promised flats or refund the money, causing financial losses to the buyers. Additional FIRs were subsequently filed by investors and buyers linked to various projects undertaken by SIVIPL and its group entities. The ED's inquiry revealed that SIVIPL did not have the requisite approvals from RERA and HMDA for the project. Additionally, there was no escrow account, and the funds collected from investors were deposited into multiple bank accounts and received in cash. The investigation uncovered proceeds of crime amounting to Rs 8.42 billion, with Rs 2.17 billion collected in unaccounted cash, which was allegedly concealed and used for personal purposes by the company's promoters and directors. Further findings indicated that the funds were diverted through fraudulent banking transactions to both related and unrelated entities, with no legitimate business purpose. A substantial portion of the money was withdrawn in cash and transferred to overseas bank accounts belonging to B Lakshminarayana and his relatives. The investigation also highlighted that the embezzlement of homebuyers' funds was carried out by B Lakshminarayana in collaboration with Sandu Purnachandra Rao, a former director of SIVIPL and the head of its sales and marketing team. The misappropriated funds were reportedly used to purchase immovable properties in the names of benami entities. During the investigation, the ED conducted searches at various locations, seizing incriminating materials and digital devices, and freezing multiple bank accounts. Additionally, movable and immovable properties worth Rs 1.61 billion were provisionally attached. B Lakshminarayana was arrested under the provisions of the PMLA in September 2024.

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?