Gujarat Struggles to Curb Illegal Constructions in Ahmedabad
Real Estate

Gujarat Struggles to Curb Illegal Constructions in Ahmedabad

The Gujarat Regulation of Unauthorised Development Act, 2022, presents a contradiction. While it ostensibly seeks to curb unauthorised development, it simultaneously legalises such constructions upon payment of a fee. Despite being introduced initially in the early 2000s, then again in 2011, and most recently enacted in 2022, the legislation has failed to halt the rise of illegal constructions or unapproved extensions to residential and commercial properties.

The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation's (AMC) practice of demolishing certain structures while regularising others for a fee has weakened the intended enforcement of the law.

Reports indicate that over 2,000 illegal constructions emerged across the city in 2024 alone, prompting the issuance of demolition notices by the AMC. In specific zones, these notices were issued for 243 cases in the North Zone, with some structures being demolished; 289 in the Central Zone; 698 in the South Zone; 125 in the North-West Zone; and 104 in the West Zone. Additionally, approximately 500 cases were reported in the South-West and East Zones.

An AMC representative explained that notices were distributed across various zones following complaints about illegal constructions. The process typically involves issuing three warnings before sealing and eventual demolition. However, it was acknowledged that no proactive measures were undertaken, and action was only taken upon receiving complaints. The absence of clear guidelines for demolishing unauthorised structures often results in notices not being followed by demolition.

These illegal constructions present significant safety risks. They may compromise a building’s load-bearing capacity, encroach upon parking areas, and strain essential infrastructure, including roads, water supply systems, and sewage networks, leading to problems like low water pressure, sewage backups, and flooding during rains.

Furthermore, unauthorised establishments such as restaurants or gyms on terraces can obstruct rescue operations during emergencies. Instances of residential buildings being repurposed for commercial use have increased fire risks, contributed to the commercialisation of residential zones, and exacerbated traffic congestion.

The Gujarat Regulation of Unauthorised Development Act, 2022, presents a contradiction. While it ostensibly seeks to curb unauthorised development, it simultaneously legalises such constructions upon payment of a fee. Despite being introduced initially in the early 2000s, then again in 2011, and most recently enacted in 2022, the legislation has failed to halt the rise of illegal constructions or unapproved extensions to residential and commercial properties. The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation's (AMC) practice of demolishing certain structures while regularising others for a fee has weakened the intended enforcement of the law. Reports indicate that over 2,000 illegal constructions emerged across the city in 2024 alone, prompting the issuance of demolition notices by the AMC. In specific zones, these notices were issued for 243 cases in the North Zone, with some structures being demolished; 289 in the Central Zone; 698 in the South Zone; 125 in the North-West Zone; and 104 in the West Zone. Additionally, approximately 500 cases were reported in the South-West and East Zones. An AMC representative explained that notices were distributed across various zones following complaints about illegal constructions. The process typically involves issuing three warnings before sealing and eventual demolition. However, it was acknowledged that no proactive measures were undertaken, and action was only taken upon receiving complaints. The absence of clear guidelines for demolishing unauthorised structures often results in notices not being followed by demolition. These illegal constructions present significant safety risks. They may compromise a building’s load-bearing capacity, encroach upon parking areas, and strain essential infrastructure, including roads, water supply systems, and sewage networks, leading to problems like low water pressure, sewage backups, and flooding during rains. Furthermore, unauthorised establishments such as restaurants or gyms on terraces can obstruct rescue operations during emergencies. Instances of residential buildings being repurposed for commercial use have increased fire risks, contributed to the commercialisation of residential zones, and exacerbated traffic congestion.

Next Story
Building Material

Ambuja Cements Drags JSW Cement to Court Over ‘Kawach’ Brand

Ambuja Cements, part of the Adani Group, has filed a trademark infringement case against JSW Cement in the Delhi High Court, alleging that its rival copied the ‘Kawach’ brand with its new product ‘Jal Kavach’.Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued summons to JSW Cement and its subsidiary, JSW IP Holdings Pvt Ltd, while referring the matter to mediation. Hearings are scheduled to resume on October 15 if no settlement is reached.Ambuja, which registered the ‘Kawach’ trademark in 2019, argues that the term ‘Kavach’—meaning shield—is the distinctive feature of its branding. ..

Next Story
Technology

Bentley Systems Named Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 by Afcons

Bentley Systems, the infrastructure engineering software company, has been recognised by Afcons Infrastructure Limited as its Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 at the Innovation Partners 2025 Felicitation Ceremony in Mumbai. The award acknowledges Bentley’s contribution to Afcons’ engineering digitalisation journey through an enterprise agreement providing access to over 250 Bentley engineering software tools. This adoption has enabled Afcons to accelerate project delivery, standardise digital workflows, and strengthen innovation across its infrastructure portfolio. Among key i..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

SBI Sells 13.18% Stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s SMBC

State Bank of India (SBI) has completed the sale of a 13.18 per cent stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) for over Rs 8,889 crore. The divestment is part of a Rs 13,482 crore deal finalised in May with SMBC and seven private banks.Following the transaction, SBI’s shareholding in Yes Bank stands at 10.8 per cent. The deal, involving 4,134.4 million shares at Rs 21.50 each, is the largest cross-border transaction in the Indian banking sector.SBI Chairman C S Setty described the 2020 RBI-led rescue of Yes Bank as a pioneering public-private partnership, addi..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?