Lavasa creditors set eligibility criteria for Resolution 2.0 process
Real Estate

Lavasa creditors set eligibility criteria for Resolution 2.0 process

The creditors of Lavasa Corp, once promoted as India's first private hill town project, have established eligibility criteria for potential bidders. They are now seeking new expressions of interest (EOIs) and have set a requirement of Rs 1 billion in net worth along with a refundable deposit of Rs 2.5 million. This move comes as they attempt to find a buyer for the second time, after the previous effort was abandoned earlier in the year.

According to the minutes of a meeting held on September 17 by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), 77 per cent of lenders, led by Union Bank of India (UBI), agreed on these minimum criteria, which differ from the previous process that lacked any specific requirements to "maximise participation" from applicants.

In addition to these eligibility criteria, the lenders are looking to make further changes. It is anticipated that a new resolution professional (RP) will replace Shailesh Verma, and a new process advisor may be appointed instead of Deloitte, as both have been involved in what is considered a failed process in the past. A person familiar with the matter mentioned that a joint lenders' forum, convened by UBI, is likely to finalize the timelines and appoint a new RP as early as next week.

Lenders are aiming to avoid the issues that arose in the previous process. It has been generally agreed that a new Form G, inviting fresh applicants, will be issued, possibly in the first week of October. Additionally, the lenders are narrowing down their choices for the new RP, according to another person knowledgeable about the situation. Neither Verma nor UBI responded to requests for comment.

Union Bank holds 12% of the total dues, amounting to Rs 66.42 billion. Phoenix ARC is the second-largest creditor, with nearly 11% of the debt, which it acquired from L&T Finance before the plan was approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in July 2023. Another significant creditor is Arcil, which holds more than 10% of the debt. Bank of India and Axis Bank are also major creditors, each with over 8% of the total debt.

Earlier this month, after a year of hearings, the Mumbai bench of the NCLT allowed the revival of the insolvency process, permitting the CoC to exclude the period between July 13, 2021, and January 3, 2022, from the resolution timeline.

The creditors of Lavasa Corp, once promoted as India's first private hill town project, have established eligibility criteria for potential bidders. They are now seeking new expressions of interest (EOIs) and have set a requirement of Rs 1 billion in net worth along with a refundable deposit of Rs 2.5 million. This move comes as they attempt to find a buyer for the second time, after the previous effort was abandoned earlier in the year. According to the minutes of a meeting held on September 17 by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), 77 per cent of lenders, led by Union Bank of India (UBI), agreed on these minimum criteria, which differ from the previous process that lacked any specific requirements to maximise participation from applicants. In addition to these eligibility criteria, the lenders are looking to make further changes. It is anticipated that a new resolution professional (RP) will replace Shailesh Verma, and a new process advisor may be appointed instead of Deloitte, as both have been involved in what is considered a failed process in the past. A person familiar with the matter mentioned that a joint lenders' forum, convened by UBI, is likely to finalize the timelines and appoint a new RP as early as next week. Lenders are aiming to avoid the issues that arose in the previous process. It has been generally agreed that a new Form G, inviting fresh applicants, will be issued, possibly in the first week of October. Additionally, the lenders are narrowing down their choices for the new RP, according to another person knowledgeable about the situation. Neither Verma nor UBI responded to requests for comment. Union Bank holds 12% of the total dues, amounting to Rs 66.42 billion. Phoenix ARC is the second-largest creditor, with nearly 11% of the debt, which it acquired from L&T Finance before the plan was approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in July 2023. Another significant creditor is Arcil, which holds more than 10% of the debt. Bank of India and Axis Bank are also major creditors, each with over 8% of the total debt. Earlier this month, after a year of hearings, the Mumbai bench of the NCLT allowed the revival of the insolvency process, permitting the CoC to exclude the period between July 13, 2021, and January 3, 2022, from the resolution timeline.

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?