SC Rejects Real Estate Bail Plea
Real Estate

SC Rejects Real Estate Bail Plea

The Supreme Court has rejected the bail plea of a former promoters Surendra Kumar Hooda of the real estate company for allegedly cheating investors and asked them to surrender. 

A bence of justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi on October 4 dismissed the plea of Surendra Kumar Hooda, ex-promoters and directors of real estate company AN Buidwell. 

The court was hearing the plea filed by Surendra Kumar Hooda and Sunil Gandhi challenging the Delhi High Court order refusing the bail plea. Hooda has sought regular bail while Gandhi moved for anticipatory bail plea. 

“In such circumstances, we do not find any reason to continue the protection of the petitioners. The scheme was sanctioned under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The attempt on the part of the promoters to stall the criminal proceedings through the scheme was not approved by the High Court. We find no error in the impugned orders passed by the High Court rejecting the please for Bail and Anticipatory Bail made by the petitioners,” the court said. 

The court directed Surendra Kumar Hooda to surrender within eight weeks. 

“So far as the other petitioner (Sunil Gandhi) is concerned, let him not be arrested for a period of 8 weeks in connection with the subject cases arising out of the three FIRs, being FIR Nos.64,114 and 116 of 2016, presently registered with Economic Offences Wing Police Station and being investingated by the Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police.  Sunil Gandhi shall also have liberty similar to that granted by us to Surendra Kumar Hooda, and he shall be entitled to apply for Anticipatory Bail afresh before the concerned Court if there are changed circumstances warranting fresh consideration of such prayer,” The court said. 

However, the court has given liberty to apply for bail afresh on the basis of their statement that some new developments are there. 

The allegations against both the petitioners are similar. 

The crux of their charges is that the firm of which they were promoters failed to give possession of residential and commercial units to a large number of house buyers despite making large sums of money.  The investors had accused the corporation of making false promises about statutory permissions and land availability, as well as siphoning monies from the company. 

"Join industry leaders at RAHSTA Expo, India's premier platform for roads, highways and traffic infrastructure. Register now to explore innovations, network with experts and shape the future of mobility."

The Supreme Court has rejected the bail plea of a former promoters Surendra Kumar Hooda of the real estate company for allegedly cheating investors and asked them to surrender. A bence of justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi on October 4 dismissed the plea of Surendra Kumar Hooda, ex-promoters and directors of real estate company AN Buidwell. The court was hearing the plea filed by Surendra Kumar Hooda and Sunil Gandhi challenging the Delhi High Court order refusing the bail plea. Hooda has sought regular bail while Gandhi moved for anticipatory bail plea. “In such circumstances, we do not find any reason to continue the protection of the petitioners. The scheme was sanctioned under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The attempt on the part of the promoters to stall the criminal proceedings through the scheme was not approved by the High Court. We find no error in the impugned orders passed by the High Court rejecting the please for Bail and Anticipatory Bail made by the petitioners,” the court said. The court directed Surendra Kumar Hooda to surrender within eight weeks. “So far as the other petitioner (Sunil Gandhi) is concerned, let him not be arrested for a period of 8 weeks in connection with the subject cases arising out of the three FIRs, being FIR Nos.64,114 and 116 of 2016, presently registered with Economic Offences Wing Police Station and being investingated by the Economic Offences Wing of the Delhi Police.  Sunil Gandhi shall also have liberty similar to that granted by us to Surendra Kumar Hooda, and he shall be entitled to apply for Anticipatory Bail afresh before the concerned Court if there are changed circumstances warranting fresh consideration of such prayer,” The court said. However, the court has given liberty to apply for bail afresh on the basis of their statement that some new developments are there. The allegations against both the petitioners are similar. The crux of their charges is that the firm of which they were promoters failed to give possession of residential and commercial units to a large number of house buyers despite making large sums of money.  The investors had accused the corporation of making false promises about statutory permissions and land availability, as well as siphoning monies from the company. 

Next Story
Resources

Jyoti Structures Launches Heat Safety Drive Across Sites

Jyoti Structures (JSL) has strengthened heat safety measures across its project sites and manufacturing facilities as temperatures rise across India. The company has implemented a Summer Safety Plan covering all transmission line projects to address risks related to heat stress, dehydration and worker fatigue.The initiative includes rescheduling work away from peak afternoon temperatures, provision of drinking water, ORS and lemon-salt solutions, and installation of rest shelters near work areas. Daily toolbox talks, worker health monitoring, first-aid preparedness, emergency transport arrange..

Next Story
Real Estate

MHADA Declares 82 Buildings Most Dangerous in Central and South Mumbai

The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) has declared 82 buildings as most dangerous across Central and South Mumbai and has appealed to residents to vacate immediately. The list, prepared after structural assessments by the authority, identifies buildings judged to pose imminent risk to occupants and to passersby. Local civic bodies have been asked to coordinate evacuations and to make arrangements for temporary shelter and rehabilitation for displaced households. Officials said the authority prioritised buildings with visible structural distress, severe cracking, tiltin..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Damage Reported At Halwara Airport Terminal After First Rains

Severe damage was reported at the terminal of Halwara Airport during the first major rain spell of the season, prompting immediate concern among aviation and local authorities. Images from the site showed water ingress and visible deterioration of the terminal interior, affecting passenger areas and ancillary services. The airport authority suspended certain operations temporarily to assess structural safety and ensure passenger wellbeing. Preliminary inspections have prioritised electrical systems and roof seals to prevent further water ingress. State aviation officials ordered a formal inqui..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement