Sustainability in Affordable Housing
Real Estate

Sustainability in Affordable Housing

India today faces the enormous challenge of catering to the housing needs of the bottom-of-the-pyramid population. With the rapid rate of urbanisation (projected to cross 50 per cent by 2050), the housing demand emerging from this population (contributing to over 95 per cent of urban housing demand) and growing urban slums (about 17 per cent of the urban population resides in slums), the provisioning of housing stock has been at centrestage for policymakers. However, despite the enhanced focus on affordable housing, the integration of the sustainability aspect into affordable housing seems to have been provided limited focus. Given the scale of affordable housing programmes envisaged under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (PMAY) with about 11.2 million houses by 2022, the importance and impact of incorporating principles of sustainability in affordable housing are expected to be huge.

Concepts of sustainability and green labels

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) defines a green building as one that can function using an optimum amount of energy, consume less water, conserve natural resources, generate less waste and create spaces for healthy and comfortable living, compared to conventional buildings. Moreover, the overarching principles of sustainability also cover aspects such as material sourcing during construction, embodied energies of materials, and effectiveness of recycling the materials used for these buildings. 

Globally, several independent organisations have defined green and sustainable buildings on similar lines, and have developed structured methodologies for outlining, assessing, certifying and, hence, mainstreaming adoption of sustainable concepts in the lifecycle of buildings, including residential buildings. While the adoption of these prescribed principles may increase the initial cost of housing projects by 2-12 per cent, the overall lifecycle cost of the housing units typically is significantly lowered owing to savings in electricity consumption (40-60 per cent less), water consumption (40-80 per cent lower), less waste generation, low levels of pollution across construction and operation phase, rental premiums, greater space utilisation and enhanced safety and sanitation (for construction workers and occupants), as well as offering higher marketability of the property. 

Some estimates suggest that adoption of sustainable concepts in the housing supply under PMAY (Urban) till 2022 can save up to 3.2 tera watts hour per year of energy consumed; 1,200 million litres per day of water consumed; and 3.2 metric tonne per year of CO2 emissions. These savings can, in turn, be used to provide lighting to another 1.4 million houses, and water to 2.2 million additional houses. 


Headway and challenges

Over the years, several government-backed missions—including the National Mission for Sustainable Habitat, National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency, National Solar Mission and National Water Mission—have been initiated with the objective of enhancing the sustainability of the residential sector at large. Moreover, the technology sub-mission, initiated under PMAY to facilitate adoption of green technologies and building materials, is also expected to have a significant impact on sustainable implementation of affordable housing projects. 

However, factors such as demand-side issues (availability of formal lending, etc), supply-side issues (complex approval process, lack of economical yet marketable urban land, etc), and profitability concerns (quantitative limitations as well as uncertainties) in these ‘low-margin, high-volume’ projects have typically kept private developers at bay and burdened public agencies with the responsibility of provisioning a majority of the affordable housing stock. Adding to this, the margin-sensitive green housing segment has seen limited traction owing to the upfront cost premium for complying with sustainability requirements. This assumes significant importance in the current housing stock delivery model, wherein the developers hand over the completed units to the beneficiaries and, hence, they share no direct interests in the overall savings accrued (owing to sustainability measures) during the habitation phase. This is despite the slew of incentives offered such as relaxations in building regulations for certified green buildings (by various states) and refinancing schemes focused on green affordable housing by select funding agencies.

Further, the subsidies provided by the Centre or state governments for this segment do not cater to or share this cost premium for green housing or the certification cost and, hence, do not offer any incentive to the public project development agencies to go green.


Measures to mainstream sustainability

In addition to the measures needed to provide impetus to the affordable housing segment on the whole, some of the themes that can guide mainstreaming initiatives in the green segment are as follows:

  • Concessional project finance schemes and operationalising green housing funds at the state level
  • Rationalising incentive models to provide project-level incentives for green certification costs
  • Updating and rationalising building bylaws to mandate select green concepts
  • Developing PPP models incentivising uptake of green housing concepts in the affordable segment
  • Enhancing demand through stamp duty relaxations, property tax rebates, etc, to the beneficiaries
  • Establishing Technical Support Cells, preferably within select state government housing boards and approval granting bodies (development authorities and municipal corporations), manned by green housing professionals funded by the Centre and state governments, and funding agencies
  • Institutional capacity-building within the sanctioning authorities as well as other stakeholders
  • Incentivising and promoting independent replication of technology pilots by states.

Mainstreaming sustainability in the affordable housing segment could seem to be a challenge initially. However, it is imperative and will eventually yield economic, social, and ecological dividends for future generations!

About the authors:

  • P Pranavant is a Partner with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP, focussing on infrastructure consulting, including affordable housing. 
  • Vishal Gupta is a Director with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP, and focuses on exploring sustainable solutions in the affordable housing segment.
  • Contributing writers include Raghav Agnihotri and Gurpreet Kaur, Senior Consultants of the firm.

India today faces the enormous challenge of catering to the housing needs of the bottom-of-the-pyramid population. With the rapid rate of urbanisation (projected to cross 50 per cent by 2050), the housing demand emerging from this population (contributing to over 95 per cent of urban housing demand) and growing urban slums (about 17 per cent of the urban population resides in slums), the provisioning of housing stock has been at centrestage for policymakers. However, despite the enhanced focus on affordable housing, the integration of the sustainability aspect into affordable housing seems to have been provided limited focus. Given the scale of affordable housing programmes envisaged under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna (PMAY) with about 11.2 million houses by 2022, the importance and impact of incorporating principles of sustainability in affordable housing are expected to be huge.Concepts of sustainability and green labelsThe Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) defines a green building as one that can function using an optimum amount of energy, consume less water, conserve natural resources, generate less waste and create spaces for healthy and comfortable living, compared to conventional buildings. Moreover, the overarching principles of sustainability also cover aspects such as material sourcing during construction, embodied energies of materials, and effectiveness of recycling the materials used for these buildings. Globally, several independent organisations have defined green and sustainable buildings on similar lines, and have developed structured methodologies for outlining, assessing, certifying and, hence, mainstreaming adoption of sustainable concepts in the lifecycle of buildings, including residential buildings. While the adoption of these prescribed principles may increase the initial cost of housing projects by 2-12 per cent, the overall lifecycle cost of the housing units typically is significantly lowered owing to savings in electricity consumption (40-60 per cent less), water consumption (40-80 per cent lower), less waste generation, low levels of pollution across construction and operation phase, rental premiums, greater space utilisation and enhanced safety and sanitation (for construction workers and occupants), as well as offering higher marketability of the property. Some estimates suggest that adoption of sustainable concepts in the housing supply under PMAY (Urban) till 2022 can save up to 3.2 tera watts hour per year of energy consumed; 1,200 million litres per day of water consumed; and 3.2 metric tonne per year of CO2 emissions. These savings can, in turn, be used to provide lighting to another 1.4 million houses, and water to 2.2 million additional houses. Headway and challengesOver the years, several government-backed missions—including the National Mission for Sustainable Habitat, National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency, National Solar Mission and National Water Mission—have been initiated with the objective of enhancing the sustainability of the residential sector at large. Moreover, the technology sub-mission, initiated under PMAY to facilitate adoption of green technologies and building materials, is also expected to have a significant impact on sustainable implementation of affordable housing projects. However, factors such as demand-side issues (availability of formal lending, etc), supply-side issues (complex approval process, lack of economical yet marketable urban land, etc), and profitability concerns (quantitative limitations as well as uncertainties) in these ‘low-margin, high-volume’ projects have typically kept private developers at bay and burdened public agencies with the responsibility of provisioning a majority of the affordable housing stock. Adding to this, the margin-sensitive green housing segment has seen limited traction owing to the upfront cost premium for complying with sustainability requirements. This assumes significant importance in the current housing stock delivery model, wherein the developers hand over the completed units to the beneficiaries and, hence, they share no direct interests in the overall savings accrued (owing to sustainability measures) during the habitation phase. This is despite the slew of incentives offered such as relaxations in building regulations for certified green buildings (by various states) and refinancing schemes focused on green affordable housing by select funding agencies.Further, the subsidies provided by the Centre or state governments for this segment do not cater to or share this cost premium for green housing or the certification cost and, hence, do not offer any incentive to the public project development agencies to go green.Measures to mainstream sustainabilityIn addition to the measures needed to provide impetus to the affordable housing segment on the whole, some of the themes that can guide mainstreaming initiatives in the green segment are as follows:Concessional project finance schemes and operationalising green housing funds at the state levelRationalising incentive models to provide project-level incentives for green certification costsUpdating and rationalising building bylaws to mandate select green conceptsDeveloping PPP models incentivising uptake of green housing concepts in the affordable segmentEnhancing demand through stamp duty relaxations, property tax rebates, etc, to the beneficiariesEstablishing Technical Support Cells, preferably within select state government housing boards and approval granting bodies (development authorities and municipal corporations), manned by green housing professionals funded by the Centre and state governments, and funding agenciesInstitutional capacity-building within the sanctioning authorities as well as other stakeholdersIncentivising and promoting independent replication of technology pilots by states.Mainstreaming sustainability in the affordable housing segment could seem to be a challenge initially. However, it is imperative and will eventually yield economic, social, and ecological dividends for future generations!About the authors:P Pranavant is a Partner with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP, focussing on infrastructure consulting, including affordable housing. Vishal Gupta is a Director with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP, and focuses on exploring sustainable solutions in the affordable housing segment.Contributing writers include Raghav Agnihotri and Gurpreet Kaur, Senior Consultants of the firm.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

ABS Marine Sees CRISIL Credit Rating Upgrade

ABS Marine Services has secured an upgrade to its long term and short term credit ratings from CRISIL, reflecting improved profitability and revenue growth through long term contracts. CRISIL moved the long term rating from BBB+/Stable to A-/Stable and revised the short term rating from A2 to A2+. The action signals strengthened financial metrics and operational resilience. The company benefited from durable client relationships with firms such as ONGC and Schlumberger. The rating decision followed stronger cash flows and an enlarged bank loan facility, which increased from Rs 3,705 million (m..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Project BRAHMANK Marks 16 Years Of Strategic Roads In Arunachal

Project BRAHMANK is marking 16 years of work to establish strategic road and bridge links across Arunachal Pradesh, maintaining and developing 811 kilometres of roads and nearly 86 bridges that range from small culverts to large steel and arch bridges. These transport links are described as critical for ensuring year-round movement of defence personnel, equipment and essential supplies while improving everyday travel for people in remote villages. The project balances national security requirements with regional development by focusing on reliable access in challenging terrain. Notable enginee..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Longleng CSOs Give One Week Ultimatum Over Two-Lane Highway

Civil society organisations (CSOs) in Longleng district have demanded immediate restoration of the deteriorating Changtongya–Longleng two-lane road and sought a detailed status report on the stalled construction within one week. The demand followed a consultative meeting convened under the Phom Peoples' Council (PPC) to discuss welfare and development concerns. PPC president YB Angam Phom said prolonged non-maintenance had caused hardship to commuters and affected transportation, local commerce and the district's development. The meeting urged authorities to undertake immediate restoration a..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement