Bombay HC considers timelines for appeals on illegal Goa constructions
ECONOMY & POLICY

Bombay HC considers timelines for appeals on illegal Goa constructions

The High Court of Bombay at Goa indicated that it is considering establishing a timeline to decide appeals related to illegal constructions and may even impose costs for these appeals.

The division bench noted that while demolition is not the sole solution to illegal constructions, action must be taken to prevent their occurrence. This was stated during the hearing of a suo motu petition regarding illegal constructions.

The bench, which included Justices MS Karnik and Valmiki Menezes, emphasized the “serious need for legislation” since the current penal provisions do not serve as a deterrent.

During the hearing, the High Court examined municipal laws under the Municipality Act, the powers of the chief officer, and sought to identify the responsible officers who address complaints about illegal constructions in municipal areas.

Advocate General Devidas Pangam mentioned that the chief officer, municipal engineer, and municipal inspector could hold regular meetings to discuss illegal constructions within their jurisdiction, reviewing complaints received, show cause notices issued, and actions taken.

Pangam suggested that the court should prioritize addressing illegal constructions along the roadside, as this issue is escalating.

He proposed that the High Court issue notices to the Public Works Department (PWD), highway authorities, and the collector regarding this matter.

He argued that illegal commercial structures along the roadside benefit from a significant advantage by not paying taxes, which puts genuine businesses, that invest heavily to establish themselves in strategic locations, at a disadvantage.

Last week, the division bench, which included the Chief Justice of the High Court, remarked on the “unabated voluminous illegal encroachments on public land, public roads, pathways, and the large number of illegal constructions observed in recent years.” They took suo motu cognizance and directed that a separate public interest petition be registered to investigate the challenges faced by citizens due to these illegal encroachments and constructions in panchayat, municipal, Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), and No Development Zone areas.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa indicated that it is considering establishing a timeline to decide appeals related to illegal constructions and may even impose costs for these appeals. The division bench noted that while demolition is not the sole solution to illegal constructions, action must be taken to prevent their occurrence. This was stated during the hearing of a suo motu petition regarding illegal constructions. The bench, which included Justices MS Karnik and Valmiki Menezes, emphasized the “serious need for legislation” since the current penal provisions do not serve as a deterrent. During the hearing, the High Court examined municipal laws under the Municipality Act, the powers of the chief officer, and sought to identify the responsible officers who address complaints about illegal constructions in municipal areas. Advocate General Devidas Pangam mentioned that the chief officer, municipal engineer, and municipal inspector could hold regular meetings to discuss illegal constructions within their jurisdiction, reviewing complaints received, show cause notices issued, and actions taken. Pangam suggested that the court should prioritize addressing illegal constructions along the roadside, as this issue is escalating. He proposed that the High Court issue notices to the Public Works Department (PWD), highway authorities, and the collector regarding this matter. He argued that illegal commercial structures along the roadside benefit from a significant advantage by not paying taxes, which puts genuine businesses, that invest heavily to establish themselves in strategic locations, at a disadvantage. Last week, the division bench, which included the Chief Justice of the High Court, remarked on the “unabated voluminous illegal encroachments on public land, public roads, pathways, and the large number of illegal constructions observed in recent years.” They took suo motu cognizance and directed that a separate public interest petition be registered to investigate the challenges faced by citizens due to these illegal encroachments and constructions in panchayat, municipal, Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), and No Development Zone areas.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code