Bombay HC considers timelines for appeals on illegal Goa constructions
ECONOMY & POLICY

Bombay HC considers timelines for appeals on illegal Goa constructions

The High Court of Bombay at Goa indicated that it is considering establishing a timeline to decide appeals related to illegal constructions and may even impose costs for these appeals.

The division bench noted that while demolition is not the sole solution to illegal constructions, action must be taken to prevent their occurrence. This was stated during the hearing of a suo motu petition regarding illegal constructions.

The bench, which included Justices MS Karnik and Valmiki Menezes, emphasized the “serious need for legislation” since the current penal provisions do not serve as a deterrent.

During the hearing, the High Court examined municipal laws under the Municipality Act, the powers of the chief officer, and sought to identify the responsible officers who address complaints about illegal constructions in municipal areas.

Advocate General Devidas Pangam mentioned that the chief officer, municipal engineer, and municipal inspector could hold regular meetings to discuss illegal constructions within their jurisdiction, reviewing complaints received, show cause notices issued, and actions taken.

Pangam suggested that the court should prioritize addressing illegal constructions along the roadside, as this issue is escalating.

He proposed that the High Court issue notices to the Public Works Department (PWD), highway authorities, and the collector regarding this matter.

He argued that illegal commercial structures along the roadside benefit from a significant advantage by not paying taxes, which puts genuine businesses, that invest heavily to establish themselves in strategic locations, at a disadvantage.

Last week, the division bench, which included the Chief Justice of the High Court, remarked on the “unabated voluminous illegal encroachments on public land, public roads, pathways, and the large number of illegal constructions observed in recent years.” They took suo motu cognizance and directed that a separate public interest petition be registered to investigate the challenges faced by citizens due to these illegal encroachments and constructions in panchayat, municipal, Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), and No Development Zone areas.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa indicated that it is considering establishing a timeline to decide appeals related to illegal constructions and may even impose costs for these appeals. The division bench noted that while demolition is not the sole solution to illegal constructions, action must be taken to prevent their occurrence. This was stated during the hearing of a suo motu petition regarding illegal constructions. The bench, which included Justices MS Karnik and Valmiki Menezes, emphasized the “serious need for legislation” since the current penal provisions do not serve as a deterrent. During the hearing, the High Court examined municipal laws under the Municipality Act, the powers of the chief officer, and sought to identify the responsible officers who address complaints about illegal constructions in municipal areas. Advocate General Devidas Pangam mentioned that the chief officer, municipal engineer, and municipal inspector could hold regular meetings to discuss illegal constructions within their jurisdiction, reviewing complaints received, show cause notices issued, and actions taken. Pangam suggested that the court should prioritize addressing illegal constructions along the roadside, as this issue is escalating. He proposed that the High Court issue notices to the Public Works Department (PWD), highway authorities, and the collector regarding this matter. He argued that illegal commercial structures along the roadside benefit from a significant advantage by not paying taxes, which puts genuine businesses, that invest heavily to establish themselves in strategic locations, at a disadvantage. Last week, the division bench, which included the Chief Justice of the High Court, remarked on the “unabated voluminous illegal encroachments on public land, public roads, pathways, and the large number of illegal constructions observed in recent years.” They took suo motu cognizance and directed that a separate public interest petition be registered to investigate the challenges faced by citizens due to these illegal encroachments and constructions in panchayat, municipal, Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), and No Development Zone areas.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Jyoti Structures FY26 profit rises 56.5%

Jyoti Structures (JSL) recently reported strong financial results for the quarter and year ended 31 March 2026, driven by disciplined execution, cost management and steady progress across its order book.For Q4 FY2025-26, total income rose 44.2 per cent to Rs 2.41 billion from Rs 1.67 billion in Q4 FY2024-25. EBITDA increased 58.6 per cent to Rs 237 million, while EBITDA margin improved by 89 basis points to 9.84 per cent. Profit before tax grew 53.3 per cent to Rs 188.5 million, and net profit rose 51.9 per cent to Rs 181.4 million.For FY2025-26, total income grew 53.1 per cent to Rs 7.72 bill..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Cat BEPU to Power Doppstadt Separator at IFAT 2026

Caterpillar’s Cat Battery Electric Power Unit (BEPU) has been selected by Doppstadt to power its SWS 6 Spiral Shaft Separator, which will be showcased for the first time at IFAT 2026 in Munich, Germany, from 4–7 May.The compact plug-and-play BEPU is designed to replace a diesel engine within the same space, using the same mounting locations and relative machine position. It integrates the battery, motor, inverter, onboard charging, cooling and controls, enabling OEMs to electrify existing chassis platforms without extensive redesign.Caterpillar and Cat dealer Zeppelin Power Systems have be..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

VECV sales rise 6.9% in April 2026

VE Commercial Vehicles, a joint venture between Volvo Group and Eicher Motors, recorded sales of 7,318 units in April 2026, compared to 6,846 units in April 2025, registering 6.9 per cent growth. The total included 7,159 units under the Eicher brand and 159 units under the Volvo brand.Eicher branded trucks and buses reported sales of 7,159 units during the month, up 6.6 per cent from 6,717 units in April 2025. In the domestic commercial vehicle market, Eicher sales rose 8.6 per cent to 6,797 units from 6,257 units a year earlier.Exports declined 21.3 per cent, with VECV recording 362 units in ..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement