Bombay HC considers timelines for appeals on illegal Goa constructions
ECONOMY & POLICY

Bombay HC considers timelines for appeals on illegal Goa constructions

The High Court of Bombay at Goa indicated that it is considering establishing a timeline to decide appeals related to illegal constructions and may even impose costs for these appeals.

The division bench noted that while demolition is not the sole solution to illegal constructions, action must be taken to prevent their occurrence. This was stated during the hearing of a suo motu petition regarding illegal constructions.

The bench, which included Justices MS Karnik and Valmiki Menezes, emphasized the “serious need for legislation” since the current penal provisions do not serve as a deterrent.

During the hearing, the High Court examined municipal laws under the Municipality Act, the powers of the chief officer, and sought to identify the responsible officers who address complaints about illegal constructions in municipal areas.

Advocate General Devidas Pangam mentioned that the chief officer, municipal engineer, and municipal inspector could hold regular meetings to discuss illegal constructions within their jurisdiction, reviewing complaints received, show cause notices issued, and actions taken.

Pangam suggested that the court should prioritize addressing illegal constructions along the roadside, as this issue is escalating.

He proposed that the High Court issue notices to the Public Works Department (PWD), highway authorities, and the collector regarding this matter.

He argued that illegal commercial structures along the roadside benefit from a significant advantage by not paying taxes, which puts genuine businesses, that invest heavily to establish themselves in strategic locations, at a disadvantage.

Last week, the division bench, which included the Chief Justice of the High Court, remarked on the “unabated voluminous illegal encroachments on public land, public roads, pathways, and the large number of illegal constructions observed in recent years.” They took suo motu cognizance and directed that a separate public interest petition be registered to investigate the challenges faced by citizens due to these illegal encroachments and constructions in panchayat, municipal, Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), and No Development Zone areas.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa indicated that it is considering establishing a timeline to decide appeals related to illegal constructions and may even impose costs for these appeals. The division bench noted that while demolition is not the sole solution to illegal constructions, action must be taken to prevent their occurrence. This was stated during the hearing of a suo motu petition regarding illegal constructions. The bench, which included Justices MS Karnik and Valmiki Menezes, emphasized the “serious need for legislation” since the current penal provisions do not serve as a deterrent. During the hearing, the High Court examined municipal laws under the Municipality Act, the powers of the chief officer, and sought to identify the responsible officers who address complaints about illegal constructions in municipal areas. Advocate General Devidas Pangam mentioned that the chief officer, municipal engineer, and municipal inspector could hold regular meetings to discuss illegal constructions within their jurisdiction, reviewing complaints received, show cause notices issued, and actions taken. Pangam suggested that the court should prioritize addressing illegal constructions along the roadside, as this issue is escalating. He proposed that the High Court issue notices to the Public Works Department (PWD), highway authorities, and the collector regarding this matter. He argued that illegal commercial structures along the roadside benefit from a significant advantage by not paying taxes, which puts genuine businesses, that invest heavily to establish themselves in strategic locations, at a disadvantage. Last week, the division bench, which included the Chief Justice of the High Court, remarked on the “unabated voluminous illegal encroachments on public land, public roads, pathways, and the large number of illegal constructions observed in recent years.” They took suo motu cognizance and directed that a separate public interest petition be registered to investigate the challenges faced by citizens due to these illegal encroachments and constructions in panchayat, municipal, Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ), and No Development Zone areas.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Panasonic Showcases Connected Display Solutions

Panasonic Life Solutions India showcased its integrated display, projection, broadcast and communication technologies at Panasonic Tech Summit 2026 in New Delhi. Hosted through its System Solutions Division, the two-day event highlighted connected technology solutions for education, healthcare, retail, transportation, corporate offices and entertainment.The summit, themed ‘Turning Technology into Value’, featured experience-led zones covering QSR, retail, transit, corporate offices, healthcare, education, security, projection, home theatre and professional displays. Panasonic also introduc..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Kapsch to Deliver India’s First C-ITS Project

"Kapsch TrafficCom will deliver India’s first Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems project on a key expressway near New Delhi. The project will be implemented with Superwave Communication And Infrasolution Limited to demonstrate how connected mobility can improve road safety and traffic efficiency.The pilot will use real-time connectivity and AI-enabled situational awareness to support road users, especially in high-risk areas such as temporary work zones. Drivers will receive alerts on roadworks, maintenance vehicles, hazardous locations, traffic queues and temporary virtual signage di..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Eurobond Net Profit Rises 44 Per Cent

Euro Panel Products, the parent company of Eurobond, reported a 44.13 per cent year-on-year rise in net profit for FY25–26. The company’s revenue from operations grew 18.91 per cent to Rs 503.20 crore, compared to Rs 423.18 crore in the previous financial year.The company’s full-year EBITDA stood at Rs 56.67 crore, marking a 31.82 per cent increase. Profit after tax rose to Rs 26.56 crore, while net worth increased 20.15 per cent to Rs 160.07 crore. Earnings per share for the year stood at Rs 10.84.Divyam Rajesh Shah, Whole Time Director and CFO, Euro Panel Products, said the company’s..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

-->