+
MSMEs Face Disadvantage Under IBC, Ministry Seeks Reform
ECONOMY & POLICY

MSMEs Face Disadvantage Under IBC, Ministry Seeks Reform

Government sources said the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises has repeatedly warned that micro, small and medium enterprises are disadvantaged under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The ministry urged fairer representation for operational creditors in the Committee of Creditors to improve recoveries under the corporate insolvency resolution process. The Supreme Court raised similar concerns on July 18, noting that small operational creditors remain significantly disenfranchised under the IBC.

Operational debt owed to vendors and service contractors ranks below financial debt in the recovery waterfall, which reduces amounts available to operational creditors. Data from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India shows operational creditors receive less than one per cent of amounts distributed in liquidation, and recoveries under the resolution process are similarly low. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs was reported not to be considering a statutory mechanism to guarantee minimum recoveries for operational creditors.

The dispute in Tata Steel v Varsha arose from the Bhushan Steel insolvency, in which the successful resolution applicant agreed to pay financial creditors Rs 352 billion (bn) for admitted claims of Rs 560 billion (bn). Two operational creditors had collective claims of Rs 330 million (mn) but had earlier filed pending recovery suits, and their contingent claims were admitted at a notional value of Rs one each during the process. The Supreme Court held that an approved resolution plan is binding on stakeholders, which led to the extinguishment or reduction of the operational claims in the approved plan.

Insolvency experts and some lawmakers questioned whether corporate rescue goals should be achieved at the cost of smaller businesses with limited resilience. Members of the parliamentary select committee and several practitioners noted that international insolvency frameworks do not always distinguish between financial and operational creditors and can grant voting rights more broadly. The ministry continues to press for policy consideration to address the distributional effects of the code.

Government sources said the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises has repeatedly warned that micro, small and medium enterprises are disadvantaged under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The ministry urged fairer representation for operational creditors in the Committee of Creditors to improve recoveries under the corporate insolvency resolution process. The Supreme Court raised similar concerns on July 18, noting that small operational creditors remain significantly disenfranchised under the IBC. Operational debt owed to vendors and service contractors ranks below financial debt in the recovery waterfall, which reduces amounts available to operational creditors. Data from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India shows operational creditors receive less than one per cent of amounts distributed in liquidation, and recoveries under the resolution process are similarly low. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs was reported not to be considering a statutory mechanism to guarantee minimum recoveries for operational creditors. The dispute in Tata Steel v Varsha arose from the Bhushan Steel insolvency, in which the successful resolution applicant agreed to pay financial creditors Rs 352 billion (bn) for admitted claims of Rs 560 billion (bn). Two operational creditors had collective claims of Rs 330 million (mn) but had earlier filed pending recovery suits, and their contingent claims were admitted at a notional value of Rs one each during the process. The Supreme Court held that an approved resolution plan is binding on stakeholders, which led to the extinguishment or reduction of the operational claims in the approved plan. Insolvency experts and some lawmakers questioned whether corporate rescue goals should be achieved at the cost of smaller businesses with limited resilience. Members of the parliamentary select committee and several practitioners noted that international insolvency frameworks do not always distinguish between financial and operational creditors and can grant voting rights more broadly. The ministry continues to press for policy consideration to address the distributional effects of the code.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Emiza Expands Bhiwandi Fulfilment Capacity by 2.32 Lakh Sq Ft

Emiza, a leading third-party logistics (3PL) provider, has expanded its Mumbai operations with the launch of two new fulfilment facilities in Bhiwandi, adding a combined capacity of 2.32 lakh sq ft to its network.The new facilities, spread across 75,000 sq ft and 1,57,000 sq ft, mark Emiza’s fifth and sixth warehouses in the Mumbai region. The expansion strengthens the company’s fulfilment infrastructure in Western India amid the rapid growth of India’s digital commerce ecosystem.With increasing online consumption, wider product categories and rising customer expectations for faster deli..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Ingersoll Rand Showcases Air Solutions for Semiconductor Sector

Ingersoll Rand will showcase its advanced compressed air solutions for India’s growing semiconductor ecosystem at SEMICON India 2026, scheduled from September 17–19 at Yashobhoomi, New Delhi.The company will display its portfolio of oil-free compressors, centrifugal compression technologies and advanced air treatment systems at Stall No. 1156, Hall No. 1. The solutions are designed to address the stringent air quality, reliability and efficiency requirements of semiconductor manufacturing applications.With India accelerating investments across semiconductor manufacturing, packaging, equipm..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

RECPDCL Transfers Musalgaon Transmission SPV to MSETCL

REC Power Development and Consultancy Limited (RECPDCL), a wholly owned subsidiary of REC Limited, has handed over Musalgaon Power Transmission Limited, a project-specific Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), to Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Limited (MSETCL).MSETCL emerged as the successful bidder through the Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) process conducted by RECPDCL, the Bid Process Coordinator, for developing Maharashtra’s intra-state transmission project on a Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) basis.The SPV was handed over by Shri Ratnesh Kumar, General Manag..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code