Indian airports record Rs 7,000 cr loss in FY21
AVIATION & AIRPORTS

Indian airports record Rs 7,000 cr loss in FY21

The report named ‘India Airports Review FY21’, reported losses worth Rs 7,000 crore and also indicated how total passenger traffic dropped by 63% to 115 million passengers, a figure last obtained in 2008.

Comparatively, as per the report by CAPA India, they made profits worth Rs 5,160 crore in FY20.

The consolidated operating revenue of airports fell by 64.1% to Rs 8,310 crore.

The PPP (public-private partnership) operators accounted for 31% of these losses and AAI (Airports Authority of India) for 69%.

Total cash expenditure for the year touched Rs 13,590 crore, the report said.

CAPA India is an aviation consultancy firm and has numerous leading airport operators and airlines as its customers.

As per the data shared in Parliament last week by the Minister of State Civil Aviation, V K Singh, India’s airports are ready to continue incurring losses as the coronavirus pandemic is yet to recede. A majority of 107 out of 136 airports controlled by AAI have suffered losses, while 91 of these airports have recorded total losses worth Rs 1,368.82 crore. In FY19, 101 of the AAI-operated airports incurred losses of Rs 1,668.69 crore.

Domestic traffic dropped by 61.8% to 105 million passengers, but it was international traffic that underwent a much higher blow dropping by 84.8% to just 10.1 million passengers, the lowest level in around 30 years, the CAPA report noted.

Currently, scheduled international flights are yet banned from India and travel is only allowed through air bubble arrangements. As of now, India has this contract with Bangladesh, the United States, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Germany, Iraq, Bahrain, Netherlands, France, Oman, Canada, Tanzania, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Maldives, Nepal, Rwanda, Ethiopia, Seychelles, Nigeria, Qatar, the United Kingdom, Russia, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, UAE, and Uzbekistan.

The report also informed that the passenger traffic could have been 7-10 million higher than the current figures had it not been for constant regulation modifications made by several state governments.

It was especially the case in Maharashtra, where it is estimated Mumbai Airport alone may have dropped 3.5-4.5 million passengers as a consequence. Among the metro airports, Mumbai encountered the steepest drop in total traffic.

Mumbai airport was the worst impacted among metros and reported a 75.9% drop in passenger traffic and a loss of Rs 317.41 crore. Chennai airport stands next with a 75.3% drop in passenger traffic. Comparatively, Delhi observed a 66.4% drop and a loss of Rs 317.41 crore, Bengaluru a 66.3% drop, Hyderabad a 63.4% drop and Kolkata a 64.9% drop and a loss of Rs 31.04 crore.

Due to constraints related to the pandemic in Maharashtra, Bangalore (Bengaluru) overtook Mumbai for the first time to appear as the second busiest domestic airport in India in FY21, after Delhi, the report said.

Image Source


Also read: Jyotiraditya Scindia: Covid-hit aviation sector on recovery path

The report named ‘India Airports Review FY21’, reported losses worth Rs 7,000 crore and also indicated how total passenger traffic dropped by 63% to 115 million passengers, a figure last obtained in 2008. Comparatively, as per the report by CAPA India, they made profits worth Rs 5,160 crore in FY20. The consolidated operating revenue of airports fell by 64.1% to Rs 8,310 crore. The PPP (public-private partnership) operators accounted for 31% of these losses and AAI (Airports Authority of India) for 69%. Total cash expenditure for the year touched Rs 13,590 crore, the report said. CAPA India is an aviation consultancy firm and has numerous leading airport operators and airlines as its customers. As per the data shared in Parliament last week by the Minister of State Civil Aviation, V K Singh, India’s airports are ready to continue incurring losses as the coronavirus pandemic is yet to recede. A majority of 107 out of 136 airports controlled by AAI have suffered losses, while 91 of these airports have recorded total losses worth Rs 1,368.82 crore. In FY19, 101 of the AAI-operated airports incurred losses of Rs 1,668.69 crore. Domestic traffic dropped by 61.8% to 105 million passengers, but it was international traffic that underwent a much higher blow dropping by 84.8% to just 10.1 million passengers, the lowest level in around 30 years, the CAPA report noted. Currently, scheduled international flights are yet banned from India and travel is only allowed through air bubble arrangements. As of now, India has this contract with Bangladesh, the United States, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Germany, Iraq, Bahrain, Netherlands, France, Oman, Canada, Tanzania, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Maldives, Nepal, Rwanda, Ethiopia, Seychelles, Nigeria, Qatar, the United Kingdom, Russia, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, UAE, and Uzbekistan. The report also informed that the passenger traffic could have been 7-10 million higher than the current figures had it not been for constant regulation modifications made by several state governments. It was especially the case in Maharashtra, where it is estimated Mumbai Airport alone may have dropped 3.5-4.5 million passengers as a consequence. Among the metro airports, Mumbai encountered the steepest drop in total traffic. Mumbai airport was the worst impacted among metros and reported a 75.9% drop in passenger traffic and a loss of Rs 317.41 crore. Chennai airport stands next with a 75.3% drop in passenger traffic. Comparatively, Delhi observed a 66.4% drop and a loss of Rs 317.41 crore, Bengaluru a 66.3% drop, Hyderabad a 63.4% drop and Kolkata a 64.9% drop and a loss of Rs 31.04 crore. Due to constraints related to the pandemic in Maharashtra, Bangalore (Bengaluru) overtook Mumbai for the first time to appear as the second busiest domestic airport in India in FY21, after Delhi, the report said. Image Source Also read: Jyotiraditya Scindia: Covid-hit aviation sector on recovery path

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?