MSRDC Seeks Control Of 74 More Villages For Pune Ring Road
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

MSRDC Seeks Control Of 74 More Villages For Pune Ring Road

After taking charge of planning for 117 villages along the Pune Ring Road, the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) has requested that 74 additional villages be brought under its jurisdiction to enable integrated and coordinated planning for the entire Ring Road project.

In October 2024, the Urban Development Department (UDD) had designated MSRDC as the planning authority for 117 villages across five talukas along the Pune Ring Road. Work on preparing the development plan (DP) for these villages is already underway. However, on 18 September 2025, MSRDC Managing Director Anil Kumar Gaikwad wrote to the UDD, seeking inclusion of additional villages.

The villages proposed for inclusion span across Haveli, Bhor, Purandar, Mulshi, and Rajgad talukas, including areas such as Kondhanpur, Kikvi, Nasrapur, Pirangut, and Malavali, among others.

Following the request, the UDD on 29 September asked the Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority (PMRDA) to share its opinion. A senior PMRDA official confirmed that its planning department is drafting its response. “We will convey our concerns soon. The decision could impact the overall development framework of the PMRDA region,” the official said.

The Pune Ring Road aims to ease traffic congestion across Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad. With tenders finalised and project formalities largely complete, MSRDC is moving swiftly with implementation. However, its latest demand has raised concerns over overlapping administrative powers and long-term regional planning conflicts within the Pune Metropolitan Region (PMR).

Currently, the 117 villages under MSRDC’s control are divided into three separate zones, making cohesive planning challenging. Some villages, such as Sangrun in Haveli and Kikvi in Bhor, remain disconnected from the main project area. Given that the Purandar International Airport is situated near the Ring Road, MSRDC has argued that the area must be developed in a coordinated manner. The Ring Road’s Sonori intersection in Purandar is also expected to handle airport-bound traffic. Local gram panchayats, including Deori, have formally requested inclusion in the plan.

If the proposal is approved, the area under MSRDC’s special planning zone would expand from 668 square kilometres to 1,062 square kilometres.

Civic activist Sudhir Kulkarni criticised the move, stating, “The state government has already authorised MSRDC to grant building permissions for 117 villages and now intends to add more. This undermines the very purpose of establishing the PMRDA. If this continues, the PMRDA will lose its relevance entirely.”

He added that PMRDA relies heavily on revenue generated through development charges from construction permissions. “If major villages near the Ring Road are transferred to MSRDC, all construction-related income will shift there, leaving PMRDA financially weakened,” he said.

The proposal has sparked a debate over planning authority, regional coordination, and revenue control, highlighting the growing tension between MSRDC’s infrastructure ambitions and PMRDA’s regional development mandate.

After taking charge of planning for 117 villages along the Pune Ring Road, the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) has requested that 74 additional villages be brought under its jurisdiction to enable integrated and coordinated planning for the entire Ring Road project. In October 2024, the Urban Development Department (UDD) had designated MSRDC as the planning authority for 117 villages across five talukas along the Pune Ring Road. Work on preparing the development plan (DP) for these villages is already underway. However, on 18 September 2025, MSRDC Managing Director Anil Kumar Gaikwad wrote to the UDD, seeking inclusion of additional villages. The villages proposed for inclusion span across Haveli, Bhor, Purandar, Mulshi, and Rajgad talukas, including areas such as Kondhanpur, Kikvi, Nasrapur, Pirangut, and Malavali, among others. Following the request, the UDD on 29 September asked the Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority (PMRDA) to share its opinion. A senior PMRDA official confirmed that its planning department is drafting its response. “We will convey our concerns soon. The decision could impact the overall development framework of the PMRDA region,” the official said. The Pune Ring Road aims to ease traffic congestion across Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad. With tenders finalised and project formalities largely complete, MSRDC is moving swiftly with implementation. However, its latest demand has raised concerns over overlapping administrative powers and long-term regional planning conflicts within the Pune Metropolitan Region (PMR). Currently, the 117 villages under MSRDC’s control are divided into three separate zones, making cohesive planning challenging. Some villages, such as Sangrun in Haveli and Kikvi in Bhor, remain disconnected from the main project area. Given that the Purandar International Airport is situated near the Ring Road, MSRDC has argued that the area must be developed in a coordinated manner. The Ring Road’s Sonori intersection in Purandar is also expected to handle airport-bound traffic. Local gram panchayats, including Deori, have formally requested inclusion in the plan. If the proposal is approved, the area under MSRDC’s special planning zone would expand from 668 square kilometres to 1,062 square kilometres. Civic activist Sudhir Kulkarni criticised the move, stating, “The state government has already authorised MSRDC to grant building permissions for 117 villages and now intends to add more. This undermines the very purpose of establishing the PMRDA. If this continues, the PMRDA will lose its relevance entirely.” He added that PMRDA relies heavily on revenue generated through development charges from construction permissions. “If major villages near the Ring Road are transferred to MSRDC, all construction-related income will shift there, leaving PMRDA financially weakened,” he said. The proposal has sparked a debate over planning authority, regional coordination, and revenue control, highlighting the growing tension between MSRDC’s infrastructure ambitions and PMRDA’s regional development mandate.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Products

Koemmerling opens Navi Mumbai experience centre

Koemmerling, a brand of the profine Group, has expanded its presence in the Mumbai metropolitan region with the opening of a new experience centre in Navi Mumbai and launched its Allure S46 minimal sliding door system for the Indian market.Located in CBD Belapur, the facility was inaugurated by Peter Mrosik, Owner and CEO, profine Group, along with Farid Khan, Chairman and Managing Director, profine India, and Kamal Bajaj, CEO, profine India.The company said the new centre will showcase its portfolio of uPVC and aluminium window and door systems to architects, developers and homeowners.The ina..

Next Story
Products

India's waterproofing market nears Rs 150 bn milestone

India's waterproofing industry is approaching a market size of Rs 150 billion and is expected to surpass the $2 billion milestone, according to speakers at the 2nd India International Waterproofers Conference & Expo 2026 organised by the Waterproofers Association of India (WAI) in New Delhi.The two-day event brought together more than 20 speakers, 55 international delegates and 53 exhibition booths, with discussions focusing on climate-resilient construction, advanced waterproofing technologies and international collaboration.Inaugurating the event, Durga Shanker Mishra, former Secretary, ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Dilip Buildcon Q1 FY27 Revenue at Rs 23.78 billion

Dilip Buildcon Limited reported consolidated revenue from operations of Rs 2,378 crore in Q1 FY27, along with EBITDA of Rs 429 crore and profit after tax of Rs 128 crore.Consolidated EBITDA margin stood at 18.1%, improving from 17.1% in Q4 FY26. On a standalone basis, revenue from operations was Rs 1,930 crore, EBITDA stood at Rs 199 crore and PAT was Rs 39 crore, with an EBITDA margin of 10.3%.The company’s order book stood at Rs 27,691 crore as of 30 June 2026, compared with Rs 28,830 crore as of 31 March 2026. Roads and highways accounted for 17.1% of the order book, irrigation and water ..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement