NGT Questions Bengaluru Tunnel Project Over Ecological Risks

16 Sep 2025 CW Team

At the first hearing on 10 September, the tribunal directed notices be served to the State Government, Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA), State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Bangalore Smart Infrastructure Limited (B-SMILE), Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), and the project consultants.

The petition, filed by Bengaluru Praja Vedike and other concerned citizens, highlights flaws in the Detailed Project Report (DPR), citing factual errors, incomplete annexures, and the absence of key studies, including site-specific geological surveys, hydrological and flood-risk mapping, biodiversity assessments, and tree enumeration.

Petitioners claim the traffic modelling is inaccurate, excluding major vehicle categories, underestimating emissions, and failing to resolve congestion at critical junctions.

The State Cabinet approved the 16.74 km twin-tube tunnel from Hebbal to Silk Board at an estimated cost of Rs 19 billion on 22 May. B-SMILE was formed shortly thereafter, and Rodic Consultants prepared the DPR in under three months—a process petitioners argue was rushed, politically motivated, and lacked credible technical assessment or alignment with the Comprehensive Mobility Plan 2020.

The petition states the tunnel cuts through ecologically sensitive areas, including the Peninsular Gneiss at Lal Bagh, Hebbal Valley’s stormwater corridor, and the critically polluted Peenya Industrial Area, raising concerns of groundwater depletion, soil instability, and flooding. Independent studies, including from the Indian Institute of Science, warn the project will shift commuters from public to private transport, increase fossil fuel use and emissions, and exacerbate climate vulnerabilities.

Statutory bodies such as the Directorate of Urban Land Transport (DULT) have confirmed the project contradicts Bengaluru’s mobility and climate policies, recommending alternatives. Petitioners further note the proposed Metro corridor along the same route offers a more sustainable, accessible, and environmentally sound transport solution.

Deputy Chief Minister and Bengaluru Development Minister D K Shivakumar’s ambitious Tunnel Road project faces scrutiny following a petition by a city-based citizens’ group. The Southern Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued notices to multiple government agencies, requesting formal responses.At the first hearing on 10 September, the tribunal directed notices be served to the State Government, Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA), State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Bangalore Smart Infrastructure Limited (B-SMILE), Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), and the project consultants.The petition, filed by Bengaluru Praja Vedike and other concerned citizens, highlights flaws in the Detailed Project Report (DPR), citing factual errors, incomplete annexures, and the absence of key studies, including site-specific geological surveys, hydrological and flood-risk mapping, biodiversity assessments, and tree enumeration.Petitioners claim the traffic modelling is inaccurate, excluding major vehicle categories, underestimating emissions, and failing to resolve congestion at critical junctions.The State Cabinet approved the 16.74 km twin-tube tunnel from Hebbal to Silk Board at an estimated cost of Rs 19 billion on 22 May. B-SMILE was formed shortly thereafter, and Rodic Consultants prepared the DPR in under three months—a process petitioners argue was rushed, politically motivated, and lacked credible technical assessment or alignment with the Comprehensive Mobility Plan 2020.The petition states the tunnel cuts through ecologically sensitive areas, including the Peninsular Gneiss at Lal Bagh, Hebbal Valley’s stormwater corridor, and the critically polluted Peenya Industrial Area, raising concerns of groundwater depletion, soil instability, and flooding. Independent studies, including from the Indian Institute of Science, warn the project will shift commuters from public to private transport, increase fossil fuel use and emissions, and exacerbate climate vulnerabilities.Statutory bodies such as the Directorate of Urban Land Transport (DULT) have confirmed the project contradicts Bengaluru’s mobility and climate policies, recommending alternatives. Petitioners further note the proposed Metro corridor along the same route offers a more sustainable, accessible, and environmentally sound transport solution.

Infrastructure Energy

09 Jan 2026

Rajesh Power Secures 65 MW BESS Project in Gujarat

Rajesh Power Services has recently secured a 65 MW / 130 MWh standalone Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) project in Gujarat, marking its entry into utility-scale energy storage. The company received a Letter of Intent from Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam for the project, which will be developed at Virpore under a tariff-based competitive bidding mechanism supported by Viability Gap Funding through the Power System Development Fund.The project is expected to be executed within 18 months from the signing of the Battery Energy Storage Purchase Agreement. With the ability to supply 65 MW of power for..

Infrastructure Energy

09 Jan 2026

ONGC Forms JV with MOL for Ethane Shipping Operations

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (Oil and Natural Gas Corporation) has recently entered the ethane shipping segment through joint venture agreements with M/s Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd (Mitsui O.S.K. Lines), Japan. The agreements involve equity participation in two joint venture entities—Bharat Ethane One IFSC Private Limited and Bharat Ethane Two IFSC Private Limited—registered at GIFT City, Gandhinagar.Under the arrangement, ONGC will subscribe to 2,00,000 equity shares of Rs 100 each in both entities, resulting in a 50 per cent equity holding in each joint venture, with the remaining stake ..

Infrastructure Energy

09 Jan 2026

Waaree Energy Storage Raises Rs 10.03 Billio for 20 GWh Plant

Waaree Energy Storage Solutions Private, a subsidiary of Waaree Energies, has recently completed a strategic fund raise of around Rs 10.03 billion from a group of strategic investors, including family offices, high-net-worth individuals and institutional backers. The funding strengthens the company’s position in India’s rapidly expanding energy storage ecosystem.The capital raise forms part of an announced capital expenditure programme of nearly Rs 100 billion for setting up a 20 GWh advanced lithium-ion cell and battery pack manufacturing facility. The plant will manufacture high-performa..