Suez Canal crisis: Israel rail route as alternative
PORTS & SHIPPING

Suez Canal crisis: Israel rail route as alternative

Talks about an alternative to the Suez Canal are ongoing, after more than 400 vessels were left stranded at either end of the canal after the 400 m container ship Ever Given ran aground leading to the blockage on March 23.

Eilat is a southern Israeli port and resort town on the Red Sea, near Jordan. In 2012, the Israeli cabinet voted to construct a railway line in Eilat to provide passenger and freight service, but subsequent studies showed that the project was not economically feasible, and the project had to be shelved. An article in the Haaretz suggests that in the aftermath of the unprecedented crisis caused on the Suez Canal by the Ever Given, this would be a good time to revive the project.

Instead of turning left at the north end of the Red Sea to pass through the canal, oceangoing vessels could veer right up the Gulf of Eilat, unload their cargo to adjacent trains for shipment to Ashdod or Haifa ports, and then reload it onto ships bound for Europe.

Shippers would save Suez Canal fees that can come to hundreds of thousands of dollars, and Israel would collect a fee for moving goods between its ports.

However, the reason for shelving the project is that it was found economically unviable and infeasible. A 2013 study by Professor Eran Feitelson and the late Professor Moshe Givoni found that Eilat Port could not be expanded enough to justify the cost of a railway line without creating major environmental damage.

President of the Israel Chamber of Shipping Yoram Sebbah has rejected the idea of using the railway line. Israel's ports are already operating at capacity and can't accept more vessels without creating long lines. Today, Eilat serves mainly as a port of entry for imported vehicles from East Asia for the Israeli market.

In the 1950s and 60s, when Egypt closed the Suez Canal to Israeli traffic, Eilat had played an important strategic role. A declassified memorandum reveals that the US planned in 1963 to create an alternative to the Suez Canal via nearly 260 km through the desert.

Image Source


Also read: Suez Canal crisis impact on India will be seen over months

Talks about an alternative to the Suez Canal are ongoing, after more than 400 vessels were left stranded at either end of the canal after the 400 m container ship Ever Given ran aground leading to the blockage on March 23.Eilat is a southern Israeli port and resort town on the Red Sea, near Jordan. In 2012, the Israeli cabinet voted to construct a railway line in Eilat to provide passenger and freight service, but subsequent studies showed that the project was not economically feasible, and the project had to be shelved. An article in the Haaretz suggests that in the aftermath of the unprecedented crisis caused on the Suez Canal by the Ever Given, this would be a good time to revive the project. Instead of turning left at the north end of the Red Sea to pass through the canal, oceangoing vessels could veer right up the Gulf of Eilat, unload their cargo to adjacent trains for shipment to Ashdod or Haifa ports, and then reload it onto ships bound for Europe. Shippers would save Suez Canal fees that can come to hundreds of thousands of dollars, and Israel would collect a fee for moving goods between its ports. However, the reason for shelving the project is that it was found economically unviable and infeasible. A 2013 study by Professor Eran Feitelson and the late Professor Moshe Givoni found that Eilat Port could not be expanded enough to justify the cost of a railway line without creating major environmental damage. President of the Israel Chamber of Shipping Yoram Sebbah has rejected the idea of using the railway line. Israel's ports are already operating at capacity and can't accept more vessels without creating long lines. Today, Eilat serves mainly as a port of entry for imported vehicles from East Asia for the Israeli market. In the 1950s and 60s, when Egypt closed the Suez Canal to Israeli traffic, Eilat had played an important strategic role. A declassified memorandum reveals that the US planned in 1963 to create an alternative to the Suez Canal via nearly 260 km through the desert. Image Source Also read: Suez Canal crisis impact on India will be seen over months

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Products

Koemmerling opens Navi Mumbai experience centre

Koemmerling, a brand of the profine Group, has expanded its presence in the Mumbai metropolitan region with the opening of a new experience centre in Navi Mumbai and launched its Allure S46 minimal sliding door system for the Indian market.Located in CBD Belapur, the facility was inaugurated by Peter Mrosik, Owner and CEO, profine Group, along with Farid Khan, Chairman and Managing Director, profine India, and Kamal Bajaj, CEO, profine India.The company said the new centre will showcase its portfolio of uPVC and aluminium window and door systems to architects, developers and homeowners.The ina..

Next Story
Products

India's waterproofing market nears Rs 150 bn milestone

India's waterproofing industry is approaching a market size of Rs 150 billion and is expected to surpass the $2 billion milestone, according to speakers at the 2nd India International Waterproofers Conference & Expo 2026 organised by the Waterproofers Association of India (WAI) in New Delhi.The two-day event brought together more than 20 speakers, 55 international delegates and 53 exhibition booths, with discussions focusing on climate-resilient construction, advanced waterproofing technologies and international collaboration.Inaugurating the event, Durga Shanker Mishra, former Secretary, ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Dilip Buildcon Q1 FY27 Revenue at Rs 23.78 billion

Dilip Buildcon Limited reported consolidated revenue from operations of Rs 2,378 crore in Q1 FY27, along with EBITDA of Rs 429 crore and profit after tax of Rs 128 crore.Consolidated EBITDA margin stood at 18.1%, improving from 17.1% in Q4 FY26. On a standalone basis, revenue from operations was Rs 1,930 crore, EBITDA stood at Rs 199 crore and PAT was Rs 39 crore, with an EBITDA margin of 10.3%.The company’s order book stood at Rs 27,691 crore as of 30 June 2026, compared with Rs 28,830 crore as of 31 March 2026. Roads and highways accounted for 17.1% of the order book, irrigation and water ..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement