Kerala Opposes Mines And Minerals Amendment Bill
COAL & MINING

Kerala Opposes Mines And Minerals Amendment Bill

Kerala has strongly opposed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, which was passed by both Houses of Parliament, arguing that the measure transfers states' rights and authority over land to the jurisdiction of the Union government. The Union government has presented the amendment as a mechanism to ensure uniform mineral rates across the country. Opposition parties in Parliament criticised the legislation for seeking to restrict the powers of states to impose taxes on mineral rights and on mineral-rich lands.

Chief Minister VD Satheesan said after the state cabinet meeting that the legislation encroaches upon powers that belong to the states under the Constitution. He highlighted item 18 of the State List and noted that the right to grant mining leases and to determine non-royalty fees payable to the state has traditionally rested with the state. Satheesan argued that the bill effectively shifts those authorities to the Union.

The amendment defines land as mineral-bearing and does not explicitly exclude forests and coastal areas, a point that the state government described as deeply troubling. Kerala officials warned that treating wide swathes of territory as falling under Union jurisdiction could have implications for land management, environmental safeguards and local governance. The state characterised the move as contrary to federal principles.

Kerala has said it will oppose the legislation and will formally convey its displeasure to the Union government. The state government indicated that it would pursue all available constitutional and political avenues to defend state rights.

The dispute centres on competing claims over land and mineral regulation and will shape debates about centre-state relations and resource governance. Kerala's position underscores the broader tensions that can arise when national reforms intersect with state powers.

Kerala has strongly opposed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, which was passed by both Houses of Parliament, arguing that the measure transfers states' rights and authority over land to the jurisdiction of the Union government. The Union government has presented the amendment as a mechanism to ensure uniform mineral rates across the country. Opposition parties in Parliament criticised the legislation for seeking to restrict the powers of states to impose taxes on mineral rights and on mineral-rich lands. Chief Minister VD Satheesan said after the state cabinet meeting that the legislation encroaches upon powers that belong to the states under the Constitution. He highlighted item 18 of the State List and noted that the right to grant mining leases and to determine non-royalty fees payable to the state has traditionally rested with the state. Satheesan argued that the bill effectively shifts those authorities to the Union. The amendment defines land as mineral-bearing and does not explicitly exclude forests and coastal areas, a point that the state government described as deeply troubling. Kerala officials warned that treating wide swathes of territory as falling under Union jurisdiction could have implications for land management, environmental safeguards and local governance. The state characterised the move as contrary to federal principles. Kerala has said it will oppose the legislation and will formally convey its displeasure to the Union government. The state government indicated that it would pursue all available constitutional and political avenues to defend state rights. The dispute centres on competing claims over land and mineral regulation and will shape debates about centre-state relations and resource governance. Kerala's position underscores the broader tensions that can arise when national reforms intersect with state powers.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code