Bombay HC overturns Thane civic body's ruling on Sheth Developers
Real Estate

Bombay HC overturns Thane civic body's ruling on Sheth Developers

Recently, the Bombay High Court declared that Thane Municipal Corporation could not avail itself of the "considerable financial benefit" of receiving Rs 420 million from a builder, along with the builder's development of a public amenity (a fire brigade station), without honouring its commitment under a buy-back policy.

The High Court deemed the Corporation's refusal in July 2023 to grant the builder development permission, including additional developable space as per a 2020 regulation for its free-sale building, as "manifestly arbitrary." The rejection was based on the Corporation's claim that the buy-back policy (BBP) was temporarily suspended due to an inquiry initiated after a question was raised in the State legislative assembly regarding the policy in May.

Sheth Developers, the builder, contested the rejection in the High Court, asserting that it was arbitrary and violated principles of legitimate expectations and the doctrine of promissory estoppel (a legal principle ensuring the enforceability of a promise by law).

On November 1, the bench of Justices Gautam Patel and Kamal Khata stated that the rejection contravenes established legal principles concerning unreasonableness and the doctrine of proportionality in administrative action. It also fails to meet the "test of non-arbitrariness in administrative action mandated by Article 14 (right to equality)."

Recently, the Bombay High Court declared that Thane Municipal Corporation could not avail itself of the considerable financial benefit of receiving Rs 420 million from a builder, along with the builder's development of a public amenity (a fire brigade station), without honouring its commitment under a buy-back policy. The High Court deemed the Corporation's refusal in July 2023 to grant the builder development permission, including additional developable space as per a 2020 regulation for its free-sale building, as manifestly arbitrary. The rejection was based on the Corporation's claim that the buy-back policy (BBP) was temporarily suspended due to an inquiry initiated after a question was raised in the State legislative assembly regarding the policy in May. Sheth Developers, the builder, contested the rejection in the High Court, asserting that it was arbitrary and violated principles of legitimate expectations and the doctrine of promissory estoppel (a legal principle ensuring the enforceability of a promise by law). On November 1, the bench of Justices Gautam Patel and Kamal Khata stated that the rejection contravenes established legal principles concerning unreasonableness and the doctrine of proportionality in administrative action. It also fails to meet the test of non-arbitrariness in administrative action mandated by Article 14 (right to equality).

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code