+
Balancing demands of Tier 1 and Tier 2/3 cities necessitates an adaptive approach
ECONOMY & POLICY

Balancing demands of Tier 1 and Tier 2/3 cities necessitates an adaptive approach

Project management typically involves a great deal of adaptation – to the city or town in question, site conditions, stakeholder necessities and prevailing norms. Today, though, specialised software is increasingly coming to the rescue, in terms of collaborative workflow and ensuring timely project delivery. Prashant Joshi, Vice President, J Kumar, tells us more on his company’s approach – and the industry’s outlook – in tackling project management challenges.

What is the major difference in projects in Tier 2 and 3 cities and metros like Mumbai?
In Tier 1 cities like Mumbai, the company encounters heightened complexities such as severe traffic congestion, intricate utility infringement issues, stringent working hour constraints and compliance with strict environmental norms. The densely populated urban landscape of Mumbai poses challenges in logistics, with limited space for construction activities, leading to increased traffic disruption. Utility infringement becomes a critical concern owing to the intricate network of existing infrastructure, necessitating meticulous planning to avoid disruptions to essential services. Additionally, strict regulations often impose constraints on working hours, requiring careful scheduling and coordination to meet project timelines. These complexities underscore the need for precision and adaptability in managing projects in Tier 1 cities compared to Tier 2 and 3 locations. On the other hand, projects in Tier 2 and 3 cities may involve more greenfield development, potentially with simpler logistics and regulatory frameworks. While they may require attention to local nuances, the scale and complexity could be comparatively lower. Access to resources, skilled labour, and local community engagement may vary, influencing project dynamics. Balancing the diverse demands of Tier 1 and Tier 2/3 cities necessitates a flexible and adaptive approach to meet the unique challenges of each geographical setting.

To read the full story, CLICK HERE

Project management typically involves a great deal of adaptation – to the city or town in question, site conditions, stakeholder necessities and prevailing norms. Today, though, specialised software is increasingly coming to the rescue, in terms of collaborative workflow and ensuring timely project delivery. Prashant Joshi, Vice President, J Kumar, tells us more on his company’s approach – and the industry’s outlook – in tackling project management challenges.What is the major difference in projects in Tier 2 and 3 cities and metros like Mumbai?In Tier 1 cities like Mumbai, the company encounters heightened complexities such as severe traffic congestion, intricate utility infringement issues, stringent working hour constraints and compliance with strict environmental norms. The densely populated urban landscape of Mumbai poses challenges in logistics, with limited space for construction activities, leading to increased traffic disruption. Utility infringement becomes a critical concern owing to the intricate network of existing infrastructure, necessitating meticulous planning to avoid disruptions to essential services. Additionally, strict regulations often impose constraints on working hours, requiring careful scheduling and coordination to meet project timelines. These complexities underscore the need for precision and adaptability in managing projects in Tier 1 cities compared to Tier 2 and 3 locations. On the other hand, projects in Tier 2 and 3 cities may involve more greenfield development, potentially with simpler logistics and regulatory frameworks. While they may require attention to local nuances, the scale and complexity could be comparatively lower. Access to resources, skilled labour, and local community engagement may vary, influencing project dynamics. Balancing the diverse demands of Tier 1 and Tier 2/3 cities necessitates a flexible and adaptive approach to meet the unique challenges of each geographical setting.To read the full story, CLICK HERE

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Lucknow Metro East-West Corridor Consultancy Contract Awarded

The Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation has awarded the first construction-related consultancy contract for the Lucknow Metro East West Corridor to a joint venture of AYESA Ingenieria Arquitectura SAU and AYESA India Pvt Ltd. The firm was declared the lowest bidder for the Detailed Design Consultant contract for Lucknow Metro Line-2 under Phase 1B and the contract was recommended following the financial bid. The contract is valued at Rs 159.0 million (mn), covering design services for the corridor. Lucknow Metro Line-2 envisages the construction of an 11.165 kilometre corridor connecting Cha..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Div Com Kashmir Urges Fast Tracking Of Jhelum Water Transport Project

The Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir has called for the fast-tracking of the Jhelum water transport project, urging district administrations and relevant agencies to accelerate planning and clearances. In a meeting convened at the divisional headquarters, the commissioner instructed officials from irrigation, public health engineering and municipal departments to prioritise the project and coordinate survey and design work. The directive emphasised removal of administrative bottlenecks and close monitoring to ensure timely mobilisation of resources and contractors. Officials were told to in..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Interarch Reports Strong Q3 And Nine Month Results

Interarch Building Solutions Limited reported unaudited results for the third quarter and nine months ended 31 December 2025, recording strong revenue growth driven by execution and a robust order book. Net revenue for the third quarter rose by 43.7 per cent to Rs 5.225 billion (bn), compared with Rs 3.636 bn a year earlier, reflecting heightened demand in pre-engineered building projects. The company’s total order book as at 31 January 2026 stood at Rs 16.85 bn, supporting near-term visibility. EBITDA excluding other income for the quarter increased by 43.2 per cent to Rs 503 million (mn),..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Open In App