Centre Introduces Bill To Bar State Levies On Mining
COAL & MINING

Centre Introduces Bill To Bar State Levies On Mining

The government introduced an amendment bill in the Lok Sabha that would bar states from imposing taxes or other levies on mining and mineral rights and seek to bring mineral-bearing lands within central regulation under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act of 1957. The measure was moved by the minister of coal and mines, G Kishan Reddy, amid protests from opposition members in the House. The bill was presented as an effort to clarify the scope of Union powers over minerals and to streamline the regulatory environment.

The proposed insertion of a new section 9D would provide that no tax, cess or other levy may be imposed by a state government on mineral rights or mineral-bearing land except in accordance with conditions or restrictions prescribed by the central government. The bill therefore seeks to limit state fiscal measures that are linked to mineral quantity, mineral value or royalty and to vest greater legislative control with the Union. The draft legislation contains definitions and parameters to be prescribed for identifying mineral-bearing land.

The proposal follows a Supreme Court ruling over two years ago that had affirmed states' rights to tax mines and mineral-bearing land, with the court distinguishing royalty paid to the central government from a tax. The government said the amendment aims to reduce the financial burden on mining operations and make them commercially attractive to investors. Officials also argued the change would improve predictability for licences, exploration and extraction activities that are central to mineral development.

Under the current framework, the centre's regulatory remit is largely limited to mining activities such as exploration, extraction, licensing and operations, while the underlying land has remained outside explicit Union control. That distinction, the bill contends, has allowed divergent state interpretations on taxes and levies linked to mineral-bearing land and complicated investor decision making. The measure would define mineral-bearing land in accordance with parameters set by the central government and attempt to harmonise the legal treatment across jurisdictions.

The government introduced an amendment bill in the Lok Sabha that would bar states from imposing taxes or other levies on mining and mineral rights and seek to bring mineral-bearing lands within central regulation under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act of 1957. The measure was moved by the minister of coal and mines, G Kishan Reddy, amid protests from opposition members in the House. The bill was presented as an effort to clarify the scope of Union powers over minerals and to streamline the regulatory environment. The proposed insertion of a new section 9D would provide that no tax, cess or other levy may be imposed by a state government on mineral rights or mineral-bearing land except in accordance with conditions or restrictions prescribed by the central government. The bill therefore seeks to limit state fiscal measures that are linked to mineral quantity, mineral value or royalty and to vest greater legislative control with the Union. The draft legislation contains definitions and parameters to be prescribed for identifying mineral-bearing land. The proposal follows a Supreme Court ruling over two years ago that had affirmed states' rights to tax mines and mineral-bearing land, with the court distinguishing royalty paid to the central government from a tax. The government said the amendment aims to reduce the financial burden on mining operations and make them commercially attractive to investors. Officials also argued the change would improve predictability for licences, exploration and extraction activities that are central to mineral development. Under the current framework, the centre's regulatory remit is largely limited to mining activities such as exploration, extraction, licensing and operations, while the underlying land has remained outside explicit Union control. That distinction, the bill contends, has allowed divergent state interpretations on taxes and levies linked to mineral-bearing land and complicated investor decision making. The measure would define mineral-bearing land in accordance with parameters set by the central government and attempt to harmonise the legal treatment across jurisdictions.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code