+
Centre Introduces Bill To Bar State Levies On Mining
COAL & MINING

Centre Introduces Bill To Bar State Levies On Mining

The government introduced an amendment bill in the Lok Sabha that would bar states from imposing taxes or other levies on mining and mineral rights and seek to bring mineral-bearing lands within central regulation under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act of 1957. The measure was moved by the minister of coal and mines, G Kishan Reddy, amid protests from opposition members in the House. The bill was presented as an effort to clarify the scope of Union powers over minerals and to streamline the regulatory environment.

The proposed insertion of a new section 9D would provide that no tax, cess or other levy may be imposed by a state government on mineral rights or mineral-bearing land except in accordance with conditions or restrictions prescribed by the central government. The bill therefore seeks to limit state fiscal measures that are linked to mineral quantity, mineral value or royalty and to vest greater legislative control with the Union. The draft legislation contains definitions and parameters to be prescribed for identifying mineral-bearing land.

The proposal follows a Supreme Court ruling over two years ago that had affirmed states' rights to tax mines and mineral-bearing land, with the court distinguishing royalty paid to the central government from a tax. The government said the amendment aims to reduce the financial burden on mining operations and make them commercially attractive to investors. Officials also argued the change would improve predictability for licences, exploration and extraction activities that are central to mineral development.

Under the current framework, the centre's regulatory remit is largely limited to mining activities such as exploration, extraction, licensing and operations, while the underlying land has remained outside explicit Union control. That distinction, the bill contends, has allowed divergent state interpretations on taxes and levies linked to mineral-bearing land and complicated investor decision making. The measure would define mineral-bearing land in accordance with parameters set by the central government and attempt to harmonise the legal treatment across jurisdictions.

The government introduced an amendment bill in the Lok Sabha that would bar states from imposing taxes or other levies on mining and mineral rights and seek to bring mineral-bearing lands within central regulation under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act of 1957. The measure was moved by the minister of coal and mines, G Kishan Reddy, amid protests from opposition members in the House. The bill was presented as an effort to clarify the scope of Union powers over minerals and to streamline the regulatory environment. The proposed insertion of a new section 9D would provide that no tax, cess or other levy may be imposed by a state government on mineral rights or mineral-bearing land except in accordance with conditions or restrictions prescribed by the central government. The bill therefore seeks to limit state fiscal measures that are linked to mineral quantity, mineral value or royalty and to vest greater legislative control with the Union. The draft legislation contains definitions and parameters to be prescribed for identifying mineral-bearing land. The proposal follows a Supreme Court ruling over two years ago that had affirmed states' rights to tax mines and mineral-bearing land, with the court distinguishing royalty paid to the central government from a tax. The government said the amendment aims to reduce the financial burden on mining operations and make them commercially attractive to investors. Officials also argued the change would improve predictability for licences, exploration and extraction activities that are central to mineral development. Under the current framework, the centre's regulatory remit is largely limited to mining activities such as exploration, extraction, licensing and operations, while the underlying land has remained outside explicit Union control. That distinction, the bill contends, has allowed divergent state interpretations on taxes and levies linked to mineral-bearing land and complicated investor decision making. The measure would define mineral-bearing land in accordance with parameters set by the central government and attempt to harmonise the legal treatment across jurisdictions.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Real Estate

BMC OC Amnesty Scheme Requires Key Approvals from Mumbai Societies

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has clarified that housing societies applying under its Occupation Certificate (OC) amnesty scheme must possess key approvals linked to the original construction. The requirements include a valid Intimation of Disapproval (IOD), an approved building plan and a Commencement Certificate (CC), along with a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the developer or original construction applicant. The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) makes clear that the absence of an OC alone will not qualify a building for relief. Societies must establish that their build..

Next Story
Real Estate

Gurugram Emerges as Luxury Senior Living Hub

Gurugram is emerging as a potential hub for luxury senior living, supported by available land, healthcare infrastructure, connectivity and a concentration of affluent professionals, high-net-worth individuals and non-resident Indians. These factors could give the city an advantage over land-constrained metros such as Mumbai. A report by the Association of Senior Living India (ASLI) and JLL estimates that India’s organised senior living market could represent a $10.1 bn opportunity by 2030. The sector had about 25,050 organised units as of June 2026, while penetration stood at only 1.5 per ce..

Next Story
Real Estate

Corrosion Costs India’s Infrastructure Rs. 142 bn Annually

Corrosion costs India an estimated Rs. 1.42 tn annually, equivalent to 4.3 per cent of gross domestic product, according to a report by the Confederation of Indian Industry and the National Research Institute. Infrastructure accounts for Rs. 142 bn of the annual burden, making it the sector with the largest absolute cost among those examined. The report, presented at the CII Annual Infrastructure Summit 2026, said the infrastructure-sector cost equals about 2.9 per cent of the sector’s gross domestic product. It estimated that effective measures could generate maximum savings of Rs. 495.8 bn..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code