+
NCLT Orders Response to Supertech Homebuyers
Real Estate

NCLT Orders Response to Supertech Homebuyers

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has directed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) Hitesh Goel to respond to applications filed by representatives of over 26,000 homebuyers of Supertech Ltd. These homebuyers, represented by authorized representatives and association post holders, seek protection of their rights across eleven Supertech projects, including North Eye, Ecociti, Cape Town, and Ecovillage in Noida and Greater Noida, as well as projects in Gurugram and Bengaluru.

The homebuyers are supporting the National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC) to take over the projects, provided NBCC offers an allottee-friendly plan. They have also requested a forensic audit of Supertech to ensure NBCC creates a solid resolution plan that avoids past issues, such as those encountered in the Amrapali case.

The court has given stakeholders, including homebuyers and banks, two weeks to submit suggestions and objections, which will be compiled and filed in court by the IRP. While the IRP's counsel raised concerns over objections to the NBCC proposal from 10 homebuyers, NBCC's counsel stated that they received support from over 1,900 homebuyers.

Homebuyers have also called for the complete removal of Supertech's management and opposed any cost escalation for existing buyers in the resolution plan. The final decision will consider all input, with a goal of safeguarding stakeholders' interests.

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has directed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) Hitesh Goel to respond to applications filed by representatives of over 26,000 homebuyers of Supertech Ltd. These homebuyers, represented by authorized representatives and association post holders, seek protection of their rights across eleven Supertech projects, including North Eye, Ecociti, Cape Town, and Ecovillage in Noida and Greater Noida, as well as projects in Gurugram and Bengaluru. The homebuyers are supporting the National Buildings Construction Corporation (NBCC) to take over the projects, provided NBCC offers an allottee-friendly plan. They have also requested a forensic audit of Supertech to ensure NBCC creates a solid resolution plan that avoids past issues, such as those encountered in the Amrapali case. The court has given stakeholders, including homebuyers and banks, two weeks to submit suggestions and objections, which will be compiled and filed in court by the IRP. While the IRP's counsel raised concerns over objections to the NBCC proposal from 10 homebuyers, NBCC's counsel stated that they received support from over 1,900 homebuyers. Homebuyers have also called for the complete removal of Supertech's management and opposed any cost escalation for existing buyers in the resolution plan. The final decision will consider all input, with a goal of safeguarding stakeholders' interests.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Beyond Building Faster

India’s cities are expanding at an unprecedented pace, bringing new infrastructure and development opportunities while also intensifying challenges around mobility, public spaces, liveability and supporting infrastructure. The question, therefore, is not simply whether India can build faster, but whether it can build cities that work better.At a CW webinar, Are We Designing Better Cities – or Just Building Faster?, moderator Ar. Samir Shaikh, Founding Principal, AR&UD Studio, brought together perspectives from design, development, master planning and technology...To read the full artic..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Risk is the Roadblock

For an industry often described as capital-intensive, India’s roads and highways sector faces an interesting paradox: Capital is available, but not every form of capital is willing to take every kind of risk.The discussion on Financing Roads & Highways in a Capital-Constrained Era, moderated by Suneet K Maheshwari, Managing Partner, Udvik Infra, and Independent Board Director, brought together Pratik Panwala, Vice President, Investments, NIIFL; Vishal Gupta, Senior Vice President - PA&SF, SBI Capital Markets; Sandeep Upadhyay, Managing Director - Infrastructure Advisory, Centrum Capi..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

When the Clause Bars Damages

In large-scale infrastructure and construction projects, delays are often an inevitable reality. To shield themselves from financial liabilities arising out of project prolongations, employers – particularly government entities and public-sector undertakings (PSUs) – frequently incorporate standard ‘No Damage for Delay’ or ‘No Liability’ clauses. These clauses aim to restrict the contractor's remedy solely to an extension of time (EOT), barring any monetary claims for extra overheads, idling costs or lost profits.Origin and relevanceUnderstanding the nature, enforceability and judi..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code